Clemens Lang wrote in
 <e3810e68-25cc-456f-9dc4-a03752c43...@redhat.com>:
 |Hello Steffen,

Hallo.  (I presume.)

 |> On 7. Aug 2024, at 22:16, Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
 |> 
 |> Isn't that terribly rhetorical, and can kill sheeps indeed.
 |> To reiterate that SSL/TLS are standards, they had version
 |> iterations, which possibly got around some real protocol problem.
 |> These offer standardized sets of ciphersuites, some of those, of
 |> the elder versions, are "no longer secure".  (I am no
 |> cryptographer to tell whether they ever were completely so, or
 |> whether there are "mathematical tricks" to get away without brute
 |> force for them.  That aside.)  That is basically it.  But, as far
 |> as i understand it, even TLSv1 supported forward-secrecy stuff, ie
 |> 
 |>  # openssl ciphers -v EECDH+AESGCM:EECDH+AES256:CHACHA20:!DHE
 |> 
 |> gives two members, and except for the SHA-1 MAC this looks pretty
 |> modern.  But again: i am far from being an expert.
 |
 |TLS < 1.2 only supports a single signature algorithm, which uses SHA1-MD5 \
 |as digest.
 |Only TLS >= 1.2 supports the signature_algorithms extension to negotiate \
 |modern digests.
 |
 |MD-5 is fully broken. SHA-1 is questionable. Their combination may \
 |withstand attacks a little bit longer, but probably not by much.
 |
 |The MAC is actually fine, since it’s HMAC with SHA-1, which isn’t as \
 |affected by a SHA-1 collision attack [1].
 |
 |  [1]: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/187866/why-aren-t-coll\
 |  isions-important-with-hmac

Ok, here you got me.  I would have to (actually a little bit of
re-) read the entire TLS specification 1.1 (2246) in order to give
some useful answer.  Ie, whether the non-HMAC usage of MD5/SHA-1
in TLSv1.1 is used in a way that is truly problematic, or whether
they exist in data blocks that are protected by other means,
protected by the stream cipher or signed by a key that anyway has
to be verified via private/public key cryptography.
I never read 5246, just downloaded it an hour ago to read the
referenced appendix.  (Not a network expert etc.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
|
| Only during dog days:
| On the 81st anniversary of the Goebbel's Sportpalast speech
| von der Leyen gave an overlong hypocritical inauguration one.
| The brew's essence of our civilizing advancement seems o be:
|   Total war - shortest war -> Permanent war - everlasting war

Reply via email to