I'm such a fool *bangs head against the wall*

it was sitting right there in the ossec.log ...my eyes just didn't see.


2015/12/18 15:29:51 ossec-execd(1350): INFO: Active response disabled. 
> Exiting.
> 2015/12/18 15:29:54 ossec-agentd: INFO: Unable to connect to the active 
> response queue (disabled).
>
>
so all is fine now :)

from my understanding of the ossec-doc regarding AR was, that those options 
were only available on the master.
initally i thought that AR was only configured and controlled by the master.

thanks as usual for your quick answers!! :) 

Am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 17:09:47 UTC+1 schrieb dan (ddpbsd):
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2015 11:00 AM, "theresa mic-snare" <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
> >
> > so, does this mean it is also possible to disable it with the above 
> mentioned syntax in the ossec.conf on the agent?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> > sorry for double-checking and the stupid question, but I haven't found 
> it in the official docs:
> >
> >> Active-reponse options are available in the the following installation 
> types:
> >>
> >> server
> >> local
> >
> >
> > the <disable>yes</disable> tag is one of those options, right?!
> >
>
> As usual my poor grasp of the English language is casuing the confusion. 
> That option is available on agents. It disables AR entirely for that agent. 
> So far no one has brought up the situation of disablig it entirely on some 
> agents, but not others.
>
> > and shouldn't there also be a log entry in the ossec.conf, something 
> like this
> > ossec-execd(1350): INFO: Active response disabled. Exiting.
> >
> > after restarting the agent?
>
> No clue. Probably.
>
> > i haven't found this log entry after disabling it in the ossec.conf on 
> the agent and restarted this agent afterwards.
> >
> >
> > Am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 15:55:38 UTC+1 schrieb dan (ddpbsd):
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, theresa mic-snare 
> >> <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > Hi all, 
> >> > 
> >> > please correct me if I am wrong, I just noticed that the active 
> response can 
> >> > only be disabled on the master but not on individual agents. 
> >> > is that true? 
> >> > 
> >> > I think it's a shame, because I just want to use it only on specific 
> >> > machines, that are expose to the bad bad internet :) 
> >> > I know I could just whitelist all the internal IPs, because it's 
> unlikely 
> >> > that an attack could be started from inside... 
> >> > 
> >> > wouldn't it be nice to have the possbility to just 
> >> > 
> >> >   <active-response> 
> >> >     <disabled>yes</disabled> 
> >> >   </active-response> 
> >> > 
> >> > on the agent ossec.conf ? :)))) 
> >> > 
> >> > is there any reason is can only be controlled from the master? 
> >> > i'd like to understand it better. 
> >> > 
> >>
> >> That should work to disable AR (as a whole) on the agent. 
> >>
> >> > thanks, 
> >> > theresa 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > 
> >> > --- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> >> > "ossec-list" group. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send an 
> >> > email to [email protected]. 
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > --- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "ossec-list" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to