On 2008-Oct-01, at 12:49, Chris Gehlker wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Stefano Mori wrote: > >> >> i listened to it again >> >> the only mistake is that she needed some punctuation. she said in one >> sentence what should have been four or five. >> >> if you parse it out properly, she said: >> >> Yes, we feel ill about the situation we've been put into. But we have >> look to what we ultimately want, which is to put the economy back on >> track. It is about job creation and reducing taxes. It is about >> reforming health care, where needed. And it is about reducing >> spending, not just tax relief. It is about becoming more competitive, >> and seeing the increased competition we're facing as a good >> opportunity, not something to be scared about. We have to look at the >> whole thing. The bail out is part of it all. > > You've lost me. Do you think this version is more coherent or less > non- > responsive than the original? The issue is that the bail-out is simply > does not deal with any of the things she listed. Somehow she forgot > energy independence, climate change and improving the quality of > public art.
The interviewer asked about the bail out in relation to "healthcare, housing, gas, and groceries". If the interviewer had asked about it in relation to "energy independence, climate change, and public art", then Palin could have responded accordingly. Maybe Palin should have just said "dumb question, what's next?" Stefano _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
