On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Stefano Mori wrote: > And pray do tell, what is the *actual* question here? > > "Why isn't it better Gov. Palin to spend 700 billion dollars helping > middle class families who are struggling with healthcare, housing, gas > and groceries--allowing them to spend more and put more money into the > economy, instead of helping these big financial institutions that > played a role in creating this mess?"
The question is 'Why isn't it be better to spend the money on programs that help the middle class?" Seriously, can you really not parse that sentence? It's a bit run-on, but it is grammatical.[1] Perhaps English is not your first language. I'm sincerely puzzled as to whether you are struggling here or whether you are just making silly arguments for argument's sake. [1] It would be grammatical if you had punctuated it correctly. -- The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us. -Paul Valery, poet and philosopher (1871-1945) _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
