Hi Ron:

In the context of your response to Susanne, while I have not read the
article you refer to, my sense is that the remarks you have highlighted
when taken in isolation may lead to the kind of reaction you have had.
However, if the same remarks are viewed in the larger context of
treatment approaches contained in the body
of knowledge in OT they make complete sense.

To briefly expand on that, and at the risk of oversimplification I would
like to point out that in my opinion one of the CORNERSTONES of OT
treatment approaches/ strategies is to take a "Remedial" or restorative
approach to treatment where diagnoses or dysfunction makes it allowable,
with a view to facilitate recovery
and promote independence.  Often a restorative approach is applicable
where a few deficits affect a broad range of tasks, and where the
deficits can be expected to improve.  Where diagnoses or deficit do not
allow a restorative approach (e.g. high level SCI) compensatory and
adaptive approaches are used.

Hope this helps to put things in perspective.

Regards,

Biraj


P.S.: To be honest I am not so worried about impressionable OT students
listening to some guy, as much as I would hope that such students learn
to be critical, reflective and integrate OT's body of knowledge and
frame their own perspective on it.  In my opinion this is the *least*
one can do as a practicing OT.  And when this does not happen, it should
be a message to ourselves (*not* to AOTA, just joking) that we need to
do something about it.


Ron Carson wrote:

> Hello Susanne:
>
> While not wanting to deflate the value of the below cited article, I must
> say that reading it actually made me "growl" with indignation.
>
> One of the author's, Alexander W. Dromerick, WHO APPARENTLY LECTURES IN THE
> OT PROGRAM AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY says:
>
> <<<<< BEGIN QUOTE >>>>>
>
> "Traditional rehabilitation therapies try to optimize the use
> of the unaffected limb. "Rehabilitation focuses on the return to
> independence," "The typical approach has been that we don't care how you get
> dressed as long as you do it."
>
> "Such methods help compensate for stroke-induced disability but do not
> attempt to treat the impairment, the researchers point out. "We want you to
> dress independently, but we want you to do it because you have recovered
> strength and coordination, not because you've learned a trick for one-handed
> dressing,"
>
> <<<<< END QUOTE >>>>>
>
> Referring to adaptive dressing as "tricks" shows total ignorance not fro
> only our profession but for the will, creativity, commitment and effort
> required to learn to overcome physical disability. Can you imagine this guy
> talking to impressionable OT students???  What do students learn about
> adaptation in the face of adversity if they are reading that one-handed
> dressing is a trick.
>
> I hope others on this list get up in arms over this.  Do you want to
> collaborate and send e-mails and or letters to this physician?  Should we
> send messages to AOTA?? Shouldn't we do something???
>
> Ron
>
> ----------
> On 3/21/2001, Susanne Said:
> S> Ok - here's one:
>
> S> susanne, denmark
>
> S> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> S> Fra: Spinal Cord Injury Peer Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S> Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S> Dato: 8. december 2000 18:52
> S> Emne: New Therapy Helps Stroke Victims Recover Arm Movements
>
> S> New Therapy Helps Stroke Victims Recover Arm Movements
>
> S> St. Louis, Nov. 30, 2000 � Researchers at Washington University School of
> S> Medicine in St. Louis have found that a new technique called
> S> constraint-induced movement (CIM) therapy, or forced-use therapy, allows
> S> stroke patients to improve motor functions, even if therapy does not
> S> begin until 14 days after their stroke. The results from this pilot study
> S> appear in the December issue of the journal Stroke. Each year, roughly
> S> 730,000 Americans suffer a temporary loss of blood flow to the brain,
> S> known as an ischemic stroke. Many survivors have difficulty moving one of
> S> their arms and consequently struggle to perform normal routine
> S> activities, such as getting dressed.
>
> S> Although interventions during or immediately after a stroke have improved
> S> greatly in recent years, no currently available treatments facilitate
> S> motor recovery several days, months or years after a stroke. "Millions of
> S> people who had a stroke some time ago are looking for some way to
> S> improve," says Alexander W. Dromerick, M.D., first author of the study.
> S> "Research on stroke prevention and early intervention isn�t going to help
> S> them." Dromerick is an associate professor of neurology and of
> S> occupational therapy at the School of Medicine.
>
> S> Traditional rehabilitation therapies try to optimize the use of the
> S> unaffected limb. "Rehabilitation focuses on the return to independence,"
> S> Dromerick explains. "The typical approach has been that we don�t care how
> S> you get dressed as long as you do it."
>
> S> Such methods help compensate for stroke-induced disability but do not
> S> attempt to treat the impairment, the researchers point out. "We want you
> S> to dress independently, but we want you to do it because you have
> S> recovered strength and coordination, not because you�ve learned a trick
> S> for one-handed dressing," Dromerick says.
>
> S> CIM therapy, scientists argue, helps patients regain strength and
> S> coordination. The treatment encourages use of the impaired arm as much as
> S> possible rather than promoting dependence on the healthy limb.
>
> S> Dromerick and colleagues randomly placed 23 patients who had suffered an
> S> ischemic stroke within the previous 14 days into two groups: The control
> S> group received traditional occupational therapy that focused on
> S> compensatory techniques. The other group received CIM therapy that
> S> focused on the affected arm. In between sessions, the CIM patients wore a
> S> padded mitten on the healthy hand for at least six hours per day. The
> S> mitten discouraged them from using this hand. Both groups had therapy for
> S> two hours a day, five days per week, for 14 days.
>
> S> Twenty of the 23 patients completed treatment. One patient in the CIM
> S> group recovered sufficiently to be discharged before the end of the 14
> S> days. Two patients in the traditional therapy group failed to complete
> S> treatment because one died and one had a second stroke. No patient
> S> withdrew because of pain or frustration.
>
> S> At the end of these 14 days of therapy, the CIM patients showed more
> S> improvement in overall arm strength and coordination than patients who
> S> received traditional therapy. They were particularly improved at pinching
> S> tasks, such as those critical to buttoning a shirt or picking up a fork.
> S> In some functional tasks, like getting dressed, they did better. "People
> S> who received the experimental treatment were certainly as independent as
> S> the other patients, and there were some indications that the group as a
> S> whole was more independent," says Dromerick.
>
> S> He and his colleagues hope to study a larger patient group to investigate
> S> this effect further and to find out how long the positive effects last.
> S> Using imaging techniques, they will examine the effects of treatment on
> S> stroke-related brain lesions. To evaluate motor recovery, they will use
> S> kinematic assessment techniques. Although others have detected changes in
> S> the brain after forced-use therapy, it is not known whether these changes
> S> result from routine clinical care or from this particular treatment.
>
> S> "This study suggests that there�s another therapeutic window for stroke
> S> patients," says Dromerick. "It�s becoming clear that the activities a
> S> person engages in can affect recovery and that those interventions can
> S> impact the person�s ability to perform their normal social roles." He and
> S> his colleagues are eager to see how these interventions translate into
> S> structural changes in the brain.
>
> S> Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of
> S> constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce
> S> arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke, 31. December, 2000.
>
> S> Funding from The American Heart Association and The McDonnell Foundation.
>
> S> The full-time and volunteer faculty of Washington University School of
> S> Medicine are the physicians and surgeons of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis
> S> Children's hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading
> S> medical research, teaching and patient-care institutions in the nation.
> S> Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's
> S> hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC Health System.
>
>  S> ----------------------------------------------------------------- S>
> ----------- ----
>
> S> Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by
> S> Washington University School Of Medicine for journalists and other
> S> members of the public. If you wish to quote from any part of this story,
> S> please credit Washington University School Of Medicine as the original
> S> source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:
>
> S> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/12/001208074028.htm
>
> S> ____________________________________________________
>
> S> ---------
>
> S> Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message's
> S> body, put the following text:
>
> S> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> S> OTnow messages are archived at:
>
> S> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
> S> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> S> ---------
>
> ---------
>
> Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
>the following text:
>
> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> OTnow messages are archived at:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> ---------

---------

Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
the following text:

unsubscribe OTlist

OTnow messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

---------

Reply via email to