Hello All:

It's ironic how things happen because this PM (the same day I posted the
message about the Stroke Magazine article), I was given the following from
PT Magazine's October 2001 edition, page 29.

WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE IN ITS ENTIRETY.................

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

State OT associations, backed by their national association, continued their
campaign to limit a traditional area of physical therapy practice - ADL's
and self-care.  OT organizations argue that PT's have recently entered these
areas in an attempt to broaden PT's scope of practice.  PT education and
practice, however, have long supported these areas of PT. This is a battle
that is taking place in both the legislative and regulatory arenas. It is
being used to oppose PT legislative initiatives and modifications to
regulations governing PT practice.

Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi and New
Hampshire all addressed a variety of OT-related legislation in 2001,
including its inclusion in workers' compensation programs, creation of
independent OT boards, and implementation of sweeping changes in OT practice
acts.

Forecast: APTA is monitoring this push to introduce OT practice act
legislation in state legislatures around the country.  The Association will
continue to work with state chapters to ensure that, if this type of
legislation passes, that will establish a scope of practice that accurately
reflects the education and clinical training of the OT.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

If you ever doubt that there is REAL competition between OT and PT then this
should help change your mind.  I guess the real question is what, as both
individuals and an organization, can/should we do to address the issues
raised by this article.

Ron

********************

Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
the following text:

unsubscribe OTlist

------

OTnow messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

********rC***********

Reply via email to