On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > Quick silly question: > > should it be packaged as "libotr3", being protocol v3 (which was > apparently in line with what was done for 3.x), or "libotr5", being > sonumber 5 (which is what distros recommend)?
libotr5, libotr5-bin, libotr5-dev. The previous package name was libotr2, because the .so major number was 2. Thanks, - Ian _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
