On 28 May 2014 19:57, Ian Goldberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote: >> Thanks! I suppose this is the same reasoning as the DH-commit to protect the >> SAS in ZRTP[1]? > > Probably. > >> To clarify, does this mean the DH-commit is unnecessary if either: >> >> a. the session key is longer, say 128 bits or 256 bits (but this would >> make it "less useable" for verification), or >> b. we use a verification method that doesn't depend on the session id, >> such as direct fingerprint verification > > At first glance, those seem plausible to me.
Now I'm curious: why is the session ID short? _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
