Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> writes:

> DPDK documentation is recently updated to reflect that DPDK does not
> hold any references to, nor take ownership of, the argv/argc elements.
> With that understanding, let's just release the memory asap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
> ---
> NOTE: if the patch at
>       http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/051812.html is
>       accepted, then consider this non-RFC.

Quick note - the documentation patch was recently merged to DPDK; is it
possible to get this reviewed?  I can rebase, retest, and resubmit if
needed.

Thanks,
Aaron
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to