On 21/12/2016 12:06, "Aaron Conole" <acon...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> DPDK documentation is recently updated to reflect that DPDK does not
>> hold any references to, nor take ownership of, the argv/argc elements.
>> With that understanding, let's just release the memory asap.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> NOTE: if the patch at
>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/051812.html is
>> accepted, then consider this non-RFC.
>
>Quick note - the documentation patch was recently merged to DPDK; is it
>possible to get this reviewed? I can rebase, retest, and resubmit if
>needed.
No need to resend, it still applies.
I pushed this to master, thanks!
>
>Thanks,
>Aaron
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
