> On 02/02/2017 04:44 PM, Ian Stokes wrote: > > Remove the experimental warning tag in documentation regarding OVS > > deployed via userspace. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com> > > --- > > Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 3 --- > > Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst | 4 ---- > > NEWS | 2 ++ > > README.rst | 6 +++--- > > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > index fff0a1a..3018590 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > @@ -29,9 +29,6 @@ This document describes how to build and install > > Open vSwitch using a DPDK datapath. Open vSwitch can use the DPDK > > library to operate entirely in userspace. > > > > -.. warning:: > > - The DPDK support of Open vSwitch is considered 'experimental'. > > - > > Build requirements > > ------------------ > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst > > b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst > > index 0368527..ebd0c12 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst > > @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ This version of Open vSwitch should be built > > manually with ``configure`` and been recently tested, and so Debian > > packages are not a recommended way to use this version of Open vSwitch. > > > > -.. warning:: > > - The userspace-only mode of Open vSwitch is considered experimental. > > It has > > - not been thoroughly tested. > > - > > Building and Installing > > ----------------------- > > > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > > index 5efcce2..8600f0e 100644 > > --- a/NEWS > > +++ b/NEWS > > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ Post-v2.7.0 > > - Tunnels: > > * Added support to set packet mark for tunnel endpoint using > > `egress_pkt_mark` OVSDB option. > > + - Documentation: > > + * OVS deployed in userspace mode no longer tagged as experimental. > > I think this would be a bit clearer. What do you think? > > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -59,4 +59,5 @@ v2.7.0 - xx xxx xxxx > * Removed support for IPsec tunnels. > - DPDK: > + * Removal of experimental tag.
We can put it under a DPDK header like you have here, I wonder though is the removal of experimental only relevant to DPDK or do we need to consider OVS userspace without DPDK also? I would think both are well tested at this stage so experimental could be removed for both. Thoughts? > > > > > > v2.7.0 - xx xxx xxxx > > --------------------- > > diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst > > index f5cdaa5..90050e3 100644 > > --- a/README.rst > > +++ b/README.rst > > @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ following features: > > > > The included Linux kernel module supports Linux 3.10 and up. > > > > -Open vSwitch can also operate, at a cost in performance, entirely in > > userspace, -without assistance from a kernel module. This userspace > > implementation should -be easier to port than the kernel-based switch. > It is considered experimental. > > +Open vSwitch can also operate entirely in userspace without > > +assistance from a kernel module. This userspace implementation > > +should be easier to port than the kernel-based switch. > > > > What's here? > > ------------ > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev