On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 at 18:51, Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/dpif-netlink.c b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> index 1caac4f6d..18677fba5 100644
> --- a/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> +++ b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> @@ -226,12 +226,6 @@ static int ovs_ct_limit_family;
>   * Initialized by dpif_netlink_init(). */
>  static unsigned int ovs_vport_mcgroup;
>
> -/* If true, tunnel devices are created using OVS compat/genetlink.
> - * If false, tunnel devices are created with rtnetlink and using light weight
> - * tunnels. If we fail to create the tunnel the rtnetlink+LWT, then we 
> fallback
> - * to using the compat interface. */
> -static bool ovs_tunnels_out_of_tree = true;
> -
>  static int dpif_netlink_init(void);
>  static int open_dpif(const struct dpif_netlink_dp *, struct dpif **);
>  static uint32_t dpif_netlink_port_get_pid(const struct dpif *,
> @@ -860,9 +854,7 @@ netdev_to_ovs_vport_type(const char *type)
>
>  static int
>  dpif_netlink_port_add__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, const char *name,
> -                        enum ovs_vport_type type,
> -                        struct ofpbuf *options,
> -                        odp_port_t *port_nop)
> +                        enum ovs_vport_type type, odp_port_t *port_nop)

We don't need the dpif_netlink_port_add__ helper anymore (same with
dpif_netlink_port_del__, but it is not related to the current patch).

The rest lgtm.


-- 
David Marchand

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to