I'm fine with the new name.
/Jan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org 
> [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Darrell Ball
> Sent: Friday, 22 September, 2017 21:22
> To: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; d...@openvswitch.org; 
> i.maxim...@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] dpif-netdev: Rename rxq_interval.
> 
> Are there any other comments?
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/30/17, 10:49 AM, "Darrell Ball" <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
> 
>     Thanks Kevin
> 
>     Naming is hard.
>     The name looks a bit more intuitive and matches closely with the 
> description previously added.
> 
>     Darrell
> 
>     On 8/30/17, 10:45 AM, "Kevin Traynor" <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>         rxq_interval was added before there was other #defines
>         and code related to rxq intervals.
> 
>         Rename to rxq_next_cycles_store in order to make it more intuitive.
> 
>         Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
>         Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
>         ---
>          lib/dpif-netdev.c | 8 ++++----
>          1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
>         diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
>         index 071ec14..55d5656 100644
>         --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
>         +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
>         @@ -576,5 +576,5 @@ struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread {
>              /* End of the next time interval for which processing cycles
>                 are stored for each polled rxq. */
>         -    long long int rxq_interval;
>         +    long long int rxq_next_cycle_store;
> 
>              /* Statistics. */
>         @@ -4507,5 +4507,5 @@ dp_netdev_configure_pmd(struct 
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, struct dp_netdev *dp,
>              cmap_init(&pmd->classifiers);
>              pmd->next_optimization = time_msec() + 
> DPCLS_OPTIMIZATION_INTERVAL;
>         -    pmd->rxq_interval = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
>         +    pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
>              hmap_init(&pmd->poll_list);
>              hmap_init(&pmd->tx_ports);
>         @@ -5951,5 +5951,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct 
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
>              long long int now = time_msec();
> 
>         -    if (now > pmd->rxq_interval) {
>         +    if (now > pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store) {
>                  /* Get the cycles that were used to process each queue and 
> store. */
>                  for (unsigned i = 0; i < poll_cnt; i++) {
>         @@ -5961,5 +5961,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct 
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
>                  }
>                  /* Start new measuring interval */
>         -        pmd->rxq_interval = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
>         +        pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
>              }
> 
>         --
>         1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to