LGTM, makes the code more readable.

Acked-by: Antonio Fischetti <antonio.fische...@intel.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org]
> On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 11:37 AM
> To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>; d...@openvswitch.org;
> i.maxim...@samsung.com; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] dpif-netdev: Rename rxq_interval.
> 
> Ping again. This is a simple variable rename that was requested.
> 
> On 09/22/2017 08:22 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
> > Are there any other comments?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/30/17, 10:49 AM, "Darrell Ball" <db...@vmware.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Thanks Kevin
> >
> >     Naming is hard.
> >     The name looks a bit more intuitive and matches closely with the
> description previously added.
> >
> >     Darrell
> >
> >     On 8/30/17, 10:45 AM, "Kevin Traynor" <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >         rxq_interval was added before there was other #defines
> >         and code related to rxq intervals.
> >
> >         Rename to rxq_next_cycles_store in order to make it more intuitive.
> >
> >         Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> >         Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> >         ---
> >          lib/dpif-netdev.c | 8 ++++----
> >          1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >         diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> >         index 071ec14..55d5656 100644
> >         --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> >         +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> >         @@ -576,5 +576,5 @@ struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread {
> >              /* End of the next time interval for which processing cycles
> >                 are stored for each polled rxq. */
> >         -    long long int rxq_interval;
> >         +    long long int rxq_next_cycle_store;
> >
> >              /* Statistics. */
> >         @@ -4507,5 +4507,5 @@ dp_netdev_configure_pmd(struct
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, struct dp_netdev *dp,
> >              cmap_init(&pmd->classifiers);
> >              pmd->next_optimization = time_msec() +
> DPCLS_OPTIMIZATION_INTERVAL;
> >         -    pmd->rxq_interval = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
> >         +    pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
> >              hmap_init(&pmd->poll_list);
> >              hmap_init(&pmd->tx_ports);
> >         @@ -5951,5 +5951,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
> >              long long int now = time_msec();
> >
> >         -    if (now > pmd->rxq_interval) {
> >         +    if (now > pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store) {
> >                  /* Get the cycles that were used to process each queue and
> store. */
> >                  for (unsigned i = 0; i < poll_cnt; i++) {
> >         @@ -5961,5 +5961,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct
> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
> >                  }
> >                  /* Start new measuring interval */
> >         -        pmd->rxq_interval = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
> >         +        pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
> >              }
> >
> >         --
> >         1.8.3.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to