On 25.04.2019 13:03, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com 
>>>> <mailto:ktray...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      On 16/04/2019 10:45, David Marchand wrote:
>>>>      > @@ -1171,6 +1173,9 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct 
>>>> dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd)
>>>>      >              } else {
>>>>      >                  ds_put_format(reply, "%s", "NOT AVAIL");
>>>>      >              }
>>>>      > +            if (!netdev_rxq_enabled(list[i].rxq->rx)) {
>>>>      > +                ds_put_cstr(reply, "  polling: disabled");
>>>>      > +            }
>>>>
>>>>      It's just a personal preference but I'm not crazy about the additional
>>>>      columns appearing/disappearing. Also it seems like it's more 
>>>> fundamental
>>>>      than the % usage and should be closer to the queue-id. It's currently
>>>>
>>>>      port: v0        queue-id:  0  pmd usage: 13 %
>>>>      port: v0        queue-id:  1  pmd usage:  0 %  polling: disabled
>>>>      port: v1        queue-id:  0  pmd usage: 13 %
>>>>      port: v1        queue-id:  1  pmd usage:  0 %  polling: disabled
>>>>
>>>>      As suggestion, could be:
>>>>
>>>>      port: v0        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
>>>>      port: v0        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %
>>>>      port: v1        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
>>>>      port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %
>>>
>>> Maybe:
>>>
>>>        port: v0        queue-id:  0             pmd usage: 13 %
>>>        port: v0        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %
>>>        port: v1        queue-id:  0             pmd usage: 13 %
>>>        port: v1        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %
>>>
>>
>> I prefer David's second proposal:
>>  >>      port: v1        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
>>  >>      port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %
>>
>> It would be easier to parse in scripts.
>>
> 
> I think it's better to be explicit too. I'm sure people on this mail
> would know, but it might not be clear for a user whether no status means
> enabled or unknown.

OK. I will not insist. However I'd like the words to be left side aligned:

      port: v1        queue-id:  0  enabled   pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %

So it'll be harder to misread "enabled pmd usage". Or, probably, we could
still parenthesize them keeping closer to the number as in my proposal:

      port: v1        queue-id:  0 (enabled)   pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v1        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to