On 4/25/19 12:19 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:


On 25.04.2019 13:03, Kevin Traynor wrote:
On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:


On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote:


On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com 
<mailto:ktray...@redhat.com>> wrote:

      On 16/04/2019 10:45, David Marchand wrote:
      > @@ -1171,6 +1173,9 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct 
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd)
      >              } else {
      >                  ds_put_format(reply, "%s", "NOT AVAIL");
      >              }
      > +            if (!netdev_rxq_enabled(list[i].rxq->rx)) {
      > +                ds_put_cstr(reply, "  polling: disabled");
      > +            }

      It's just a personal preference but I'm not crazy about the additional
      columns appearing/disappearing. Also it seems like it's more fundamental
      than the % usage and should be closer to the queue-id. It's currently

      port: v0        queue-id:  0  pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v0        queue-id:  1  pmd usage:  0 %  polling: disabled
      port: v1        queue-id:  0  pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v1        queue-id:  1  pmd usage:  0 %  polling: disabled

      As suggestion, could be:

      port: v0        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v0        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %
      port: v1        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
      port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %

Maybe:

        port: v0        queue-id:  0             pmd usage: 13 %
        port: v0        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %
        port: v1        queue-id:  0             pmd usage: 13 %
        port: v1        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %


I prefer David's second proposal:
  >>      port: v1        queue-id:  0   enabled  pmd usage: 13 %
  >>      port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %

It would be easier to parse in scripts.


I think it's better to be explicit too. I'm sure people on this mail
would know, but it might not be clear for a user whether no status means
enabled or unknown.

OK. I will not insist. However I'd like the words to be left side aligned:

       port: v1        queue-id:  0  enabled   pmd usage: 13 %
       port: v1        queue-id:  1  disabled  pmd usage:  0 %

So it'll be harder to misread "enabled pmd usage". Or, probably, we could
still parenthesize them keeping closer to the number as in my proposal:

       port: v1        queue-id:  0 (enabled)   pmd usage: 13 %
       port: v1        queue-id:  1 (disabled)  pmd usage:  0 %

Parenthesis proposal works for me.

Thanks,
Maxime


Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to