> On 09.07.2019 11:00, David Marchand wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:36 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com > <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>> wrote: > > > > On 09.07.2019 10:14, David Marchand wrote: > > > We can skip the non-PMD thread in this loop for consistency with > dp_netdev_reload_pmd__() if this is what you meant. > > > > > > But for a non-PMD thread, pmd->reload is set to false at init and > is never touched after this. > > > So in this case, this loop is supposed to break right away. > > > > Hmm. Yes, it seems that you're right. However, I think, it's better > to > > not wait for non-PMD thread anyway for consistency and better > readability. > > > > > > I agree, skipping the non-PMD thread leaves no question on what to > expect of the code. > > I will prepare a v4. > > > > Is there anything else to rework in this series? > > All other code looks fine. Looking forward for v4. >
+1, ran some validation tests yesterday on the new patches, didn’t see any issues on my side. With the changes for the v4 flagged by Ilya above it should be OK. Regards Ian > > > > I will be on PTO on thursday evening for 10 days, so I'd like to address > any remaining comment by thursday morning. > > > > -- > > David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
