On 20.11.2019 16:28, Eli Britstein wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <el...@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oz Shlomo <o...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  NEWS                           |  2 +
>  lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c | 87 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index 88b818948..ca9c2b230 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ Post-v2.12.0
>         if supported by libbpf.
>       * Add option to enable, disable and query TCP sequence checking in
>         conntrack.
> +   - DPDK:
> +     * Add hardware offload support for output actions.
>  
>  v2.12.0 - 03 Sep 2019
>  ---------------------
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c
> index dbbc45e99..6e7efb315 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,28 @@ ds_put_flow_action(struct ds *s, const struct 
> rte_flow_action *actions)
>          } else {
>              ds_put_cstr(s, "  RSS = null\n");
>          }
> +    } else if (actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT) {
> +        const struct rte_flow_action_count *count = actions->conf;
> +
> +        ds_put_cstr(s, "rte flow count action:\n");
> +        if (count) {
> +            ds_put_format(s,
> +                          "  Count: shared=%d, id=%d\n",
> +                          count->shared, count->id);
> +        } else {
> +            ds_put_cstr(s, "  Count = null\n");
> +        }
> +    } else if (actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID) {
> +        const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *port_id = actions->conf;
> +
> +        ds_put_cstr(s, "rte flow port-id action:\n");
> +        if (port_id) {
> +            ds_put_format(s,
> +                          "  Port-id: original=%d, id=%d\n",
> +                          port_id->original, port_id->id);
> +        } else {
> +            ds_put_cstr(s, "  Port-id = null\n");
> +        }
>      } else {
>          ds_put_format(s, "unknown rte flow action (%d)\n", actions->type);
>      }
> @@ -531,19 +553,76 @@ netdev_dpdk_flow_patterns_add(struct flow_patterns 
> *patterns,
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +netdev_dpdk_flow_add_count_action(struct flow_actions *actions)
> +{
> +    struct rte_flow_action_count *count = xzalloc(sizeof *count);
> +
> +    count->shared = 0;
> +    /* Each flow has a single count action, so no need of id */
> +    count->id = 0;
> +    add_flow_action(actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT, count);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +netdev_dpdk_flow_add_port_id_action(struct flow_actions *actions,
> +                                    struct netdev *outdev)
> +{
> +    struct rte_flow_action_port_id *port_id = xzalloc(sizeof *port_id);
> +
> +    port_id->id = netdev_dpdk_get_port_id(outdev);
> +    add_flow_action(actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID, port_id);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +netdev_dpdk_flow_add_output_action(struct flow_actions *actions,
> +                                   const struct nlattr *nla,
> +                                   struct offload_info *info)
> +{
> +    struct netdev *outdev;
> +    odp_port_t port;
> +
> +    port = nl_attr_get_odp_port(nla);
> +    outdev = netdev_ports_get(port, info->dpif_class);
> +    if (outdev == NULL) {
> +        VLOG_DBG_RL(&error_rl,
> +                    "Cannot find netdev for odp port %d", port);
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +    if (!netdev_dpdk_flow_api_supported(outdev)) {

This doesn't look correct.  I mean, maybe we need to check if port is
really the port on a same piece of hardware.  Will the flow setup fail
in this case?  Will code fallback to the MARK+RSS?

> +        VLOG_DBG_RL(&error_rl,
> +                    "Output to %s cannot be offloaded",
> +                    netdev_get_name(outdev));
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    netdev_dpdk_flow_add_count_action(actions);
> +    netdev_dpdk_flow_add_port_id_action(actions, outdev);
> +    netdev_close(outdev);
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int
>  netdev_dpdk_flow_actions_add(struct flow_actions *actions,
>                               struct nlattr *nl_actions,
>                               size_t nl_actions_len,
> -                             struct offload_info *info OVS_UNUSED)
> +                             struct offload_info *info)
>  {
>      struct nlattr *nla;
>      size_t left;
>  
>      NL_ATTR_FOR_EACH_UNSAFE (nla, left, nl_actions, nl_actions_len) {
> -        VLOG_DBG_RL(&error_rl,
> -                    "Unsupported action type %d", nl_attr_type(nla));
> -        return -1;
> +        if (nl_attr_type(nla) == OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT &&
> +            left <= NLA_ALIGN(nla->nla_len)) {
> +            if (netdev_dpdk_flow_add_output_action(actions, nla, info )) {
> +                return -1;
> +            }
> +        } else {
> +            VLOG_DBG_RL(&error_rl,
> +                        "Unsupported action type %d", nl_attr_type(nla));
> +            return -1;
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      add_flow_action(actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END, NULL);
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to