On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:36:19AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote: > Another option would be to add new command that install and execute > packet in same netlink msg. That would save us a netlink msg to handle > a miss-call. what do you think about it?
When I experimented with that in the past, I found that it didn't have a noticeable impact on performance. If it did help, then I don't think we'd need a new command, we could just add a OVS_FLOW_ATTR_PACKET to attach a packet to the existing OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW or OVS_FLOW_CMD_SET commands. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
