On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:32:12PM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:18 PM Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:36:19AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote: > > > Another option would be to add new command that install and execute > > > packet in same netlink msg. That would save us a netlink msg to handle > > > a miss-call. what do you think about it? > > > > When I experimented with that in the past, I found that it didn't have a > > noticeable impact on performance. > > > Reduced number of msgs sent here would help in certain situations.
That is plausible, but it didn't help when I measured it previously. > It is also simpler to fix the stats issue using this approach. There's no stats issue. Userspace just counts the number of packets it sent and adds them in. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
