Hi Kumar,

There is an issue with the signed-offs reported by 0-day Robot.
For additional info, please check the link below and look for the
tag Co-authored-by:
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/internals/contributing/submitting-patches.rst#tags

Otherwise the patch looks good time.
Thanks,
fbl

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:44:05AM +0530, kumar Amber wrote:
> From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
> 
> This commit avoids many instances of "using subtable X for miniflow (x,y)"
> in the ovs-vswitchd log when using the DPCLS Autovalidator. This occurs
> when no specialized subtable is found, and the generic "_any" version of
> the avx512 subtable search implementation was used. This change logs the
> subtable usage once, avoiding duplicates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: kumar Amber <kumar.am...@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> v4:
> - add doc updtae from Flavio
> v3:
> - add comments from Flavio
> - add documentation update
> ---
>  Documentation/topics/dpdk/bridge.rst   | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c |  4 +--
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/bridge.rst 
> b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/bridge.rst
> index 0f70a0cad..374e03eb0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/bridge.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/bridge.rst
> @@ -182,6 +182,40 @@ chosen, and the 2nd occurance of that priority is not 
> used. Put in logical
>  terms, a subtable is chosen if its priority is greater than the previous
>  best candidate.
>  
> +Optimizing Specific Subtable Search
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +During the packet classification, the datapath can use specialized
> +lookup tables to optimize the search. However, not all situations
> +are optimized. If you see a message like the following one in the OVS
> +logs, it means that there is no specialized implementation available
> +for the current networking traffic. In this case, OVS will continue
> +to process the traffic normally using a more generic lookup table."
> +
> +"Using non-specialized AVX512 lookup for subtable (4,1) and possibly others."
> +
> +(Note that the numbers 4 and 1 will likely be different in your logs)
> +
> +Additional specialized lookups can be added to OVS if the user
> +provides that log message along with the command output as show
> +below to the OVS mailing list. Note that the numbers in the log
> +message ("subtable (X,Y)") need to match with the numbers in
> +the provided command output ("dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(X,Y)").
> +
> +"ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows -m", which results in output like this:
> +
> +    ufid:82770b5d-ca38-44ff-8283-74ba36bd1ca5, 
> skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0)
> +    ,ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0/0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0),
> +    
> dp_hash(0/0),in_port(pcap0),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),eth(src=00:00:00:00:00:
> +    00/00:00:00:00:00:00,dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff/00:00:00:00:00:00),eth_type(
> +    
> 0x8100),vlan(vid=1,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=127.0.0.1/0.0.0.0
> +    ,dst=127.0.0.1/0.0.0.0,proto=17/0,tos=0/0,ttl=64/0,frag=no),udp(src=53/0,
> +    dst=53/0)), packets:77072681, bytes:3545343326, used:0.000s, dp:ovs,
> +    actions:vhostuserclient0, dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(4,1)
> +
> +Please send an email to the OVS mailing list ovs-dev@openvswitch.org with
> +the output of the "dp-extra-info:miniflow_bits(4,1)" values.
> +
>  CPU ISA Testing and Validation
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  
> diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c 
> b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
> index bc359dc4a..ced846aa7 100644
> --- a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
> +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
> @@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe(uint32_t u0_bits, 
> uint32_t u1_bits)
>       */
>      if (!f && (u0_bits + u1_bits) < (NUM_U64_IN_ZMM_REG * 2)) {
>          f = dpcls_avx512_gather_mf_any;
> -        VLOG_INFO("Using avx512_gather_mf_any for subtable (%d,%d)\n",
> -                  u0_bits, u1_bits);
> +        VLOG_INFO_ONCE("Using non-specialized AVX512 lookup for subtable"
> +                       " (%d,%d) and possibly others.", u0_bits, u1_bits);
>      }
>  
>      return f;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

-- 
fbl
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to