On 2/4/25 12:41 PM, Felix Huettner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 04:04:30PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> On 1/31/25 4:05 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>> On 1/29/25 12:15 PM, Felix Huettner via dev wrote:
>>>> For each vrf we use we open a netlink watcher.
>>>> This allows us to reconcile on changed route entries from outside
>>>> routing agents.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi Felix,
>>>
>>> This is not a full review, just some things I noticed while trying to
>>> debug some test failures.
>>>
>>
>> This is a follow up which includes the rest of the review. :)
>
> Hi Dumitru,
>
> thanks a lot for the reviews.
>
>>
>>>> controller/automake.mk | 7 +-
>>>> controller/ovn-controller.c | 48 ++++++-
>>>> controller/route-exchange.c | 6 +-
>>>> controller/route-exchange.h | 3 +
>>>> controller/route-table-notify-stub.c | 44 +++++++
>>>> controller/route-table-notify.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> controller/route-table-notify.h | 37 ++++++
>>>> tests/system-ovn.at | 4 -
>>>> 8 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 controller/route-table-notify-stub.c
>>>> create mode 100644 controller/route-table-notify.c
>>>> create mode 100644 controller/route-table-notify.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/controller/automake.mk b/controller/automake.mk
>>>> index 66aff8643..df24a674f 100644
>>>> --- a/controller/automake.mk
>>>> +++ b/controller/automake.mk
>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ controller_ovn_controller_SOURCES = \
>>>> controller/ovn-dns.c \
>>>> controller/ovn-dns.h \
>>>> controller/route-exchange.h \
>>>> + controller/route-table-notify.h \
>>>> controller/route.h \
>>>> controller/route.c
>>>>
>>>> @@ -60,10 +61,12 @@ if HAVE_NETLINK
>>>> controller_ovn_controller_SOURCES += \
>>>> controller/route-exchange-netlink.h \
>>>> controller/route-exchange-netlink.c \
>>>> - controller/route-exchange.c
>>>> + controller/route-exchange.c \
>>>> + controller/route-table-notify.c
>>>> else
>>>> controller_ovn_controller_SOURCES += \
>>>> - controller/route-exchange-stub.c
>>>> + controller/route-exchange-stub.c \
>>>> + controller/route-table-notify-stub.c
>>>> endif
>>>>
>>>> controller_ovn_controller_LDADD = lib/libovn.la
>>>> $(OVS_LIBDIR)/libopenvswitch.la
>>>> diff --git a/controller/ovn-controller.c b/controller/ovn-controller.c
>>>> index 612fccb42..70c3a5d1a 100644
>>>> --- a/controller/ovn-controller.c
>>>> +++ b/controller/ovn-controller.c
>>>> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
>>>> #include "ovn-dns.h"
>>>> #include "route.h"
>>>> #include "route-exchange.h"
>>>> +#include "route-table-notify.h"
>>>>
>>>> VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(main);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -5104,10 +5105,14 @@ en_route_exchange_run(struct engine_node *node,
>>>> void *data)
>>>> .announce_routes = &route_data->announce_routes,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> - struct route_exchange_ctx_out r_ctx_out = {
>>>> - };
>>>> + struct route_exchange_ctx_out r_ctx_out = {};
>>>> +
>>>> + hmap_init(&r_ctx_out.route_table_watches);
>>>>
>>>> route_exchange_run(&r_ctx_in, &r_ctx_out);
>>>> + route_table_notify_update_watches(&r_ctx_out.route_table_watches);
>>>> +
>>>> + hmap_destroy(&r_ctx_out.route_table_watches);
>>>>
>>>> engine_set_node_state(node, EN_UPDATED);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -5126,6 +5131,38 @@ static void
>>>> en_route_exchange_cleanup(void *data OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> {}
>>>>
>>>> +struct ed_type_route_table_notify {
>>>> + /* For incremental processing this could be tracked per datapath in
>>>> + * the future. */
>>>> + bool changed;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +en_route_table_notify_run(struct engine_node *node, void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn = data;
>>>> + if (rtn->changed) {
>>>> + engine_set_node_state(node, EN_UPDATED);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + engine_set_node_state(node, EN_UNCHANGED);
>>>> + }
>>>> + rtn->changed = false;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +static void *
>>>> +en_route_table_notify_init(struct engine_node *node OVS_UNUSED,
>>>> + struct engine_arg *arg OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn = xzalloc(sizeof *rtn);
>>>> + rtn->changed = true;
>>>> + return rtn;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +en_route_table_notify_cleanup(void *data OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> +{}
>>>> +
>>>> /* Returns false if the northd internal version stored in SB_Global
>>>> * and ovn-controller internal version don't match.
>>>> */
>>>> @@ -5425,6 +5462,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>> ENGINE_NODE(bfd_chassis, "bfd_chassis");
>>>> ENGINE_NODE(dns_cache, "dns_cache");
>>>> ENGINE_NODE(route, "route");
>>>> + ENGINE_NODE(route_table_notify, "route_table_notify");
>>>> ENGINE_NODE(route_exchange, "route_exchange");
>>>>
>>>> #define SB_NODE(NAME, NAME_STR) ENGINE_NODE_SB(NAME, NAME_STR);
>>>> @@ -5462,6 +5500,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>> engine_noop_handler);
>>>> engine_add_input(&en_route_exchange, &en_sb_port_binding,
>>>> engine_noop_handler);
>>>> + engine_add_input(&en_route_exchange, &en_route_table_notify, NULL);
>>>
>>> I know we for now we didn't really cover the route learning/advertising
>>> incremental processing part but this dependency here will cause
>>> en_route_exchange_run() to execute every time anything changes in the
>>> host routing.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> engine_add_input(&en_addr_sets, &en_sb_address_set,
>>>> addr_sets_sb_address_set_handler);
>>>> @@ -5979,6 +6018,10 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>> &transport_zones,
>>>> bridge_table);
>>>>
>>>> + struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn =
>>>> + engine_get_internal_data(&en_route_table_notify);
>>>> + route_table_notify_run(&rtn->changed);
>>>> +
>>>> stopwatch_start(CONTROLLER_LOOP_STOPWATCH_NAME,
>>>> time_msec());
>>>>
>>>> @@ -6254,6 +6297,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> binding_wait();
>>>> + route_table_notify_wait();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> unixctl_server_run(unixctl);
>>>> diff --git a/controller/route-exchange.c b/controller/route-exchange.c
>>>> index dc3e5657c..e7a85eecf 100644
>>>> --- a/controller/route-exchange.c
>>>> +++ b/controller/route-exchange.c
>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>>> #include "ha-chassis.h"
>>>> #include "local_data.h"
>>>> #include "route.h"
>>>> +#include "route-table-notify.h"
>>>> #include "route-exchange.h"
>>>> #include "route-exchange-netlink.h"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ sb_sync_learned_routes(const struct ovs_list
>>>> *learned_routes,
>>>>
>>>> void
>>>> route_exchange_run(struct route_exchange_ctx_in *r_ctx_in,
>>>> - struct route_exchange_ctx_out *r_ctx_out OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> + struct route_exchange_ctx_out *r_ctx_out)
>>>> {
>>>> struct sset old_maintained_vrfs =
>>>> SSET_INITIALIZER(&old_maintained_vrfs);
>>>> sset_swap(&_maintained_vrfs, &old_maintained_vrfs);
>>>> @@ -211,6 +212,9 @@ route_exchange_run(struct route_exchange_ctx_in
>>>> *r_ctx_in,
>>>> r_ctx_in->sbrec_port_binding_by_name,
>>>> r_ctx_in->sbrec_learned_route_by_datapath);
>>>>
>>>> + route_table_add_watch_request(
>>>> + &r_ctx_out->route_table_watches, table_id);
>>>> +
>>>> re_nl_learned_routes_destroy(&received_routes);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/controller/route-exchange.h b/controller/route-exchange.h
>>>> index d23bb37a2..0eb0477ee 100644
>>>> --- a/controller/route-exchange.h
>>>> +++ b/controller/route-exchange.h
>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>>>> #ifndef ROUTE_EXCHANGE_H
>>>> #define ROUTE_EXCHANGE_H 1
>>>>
>>>> +#include "openvswitch/hmap.h"
>>>> +
>>>> struct route_exchange_ctx_in {
>>>> struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_idl_txn;
>>>> struct ovsdb_idl_index *sbrec_port_binding_by_name;
>>>> @@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ struct route_exchange_ctx_in {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct route_exchange_ctx_out {
>>>> + struct hmap route_table_watches;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> void route_exchange_run(struct route_exchange_ctx_in *,
>>>> diff --git a/controller/route-table-notify-stub.c
>>>> b/controller/route-table-notify-stub.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000..0a83a3e93
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/controller/route-table-notify-stub.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, STACKIT GmbH & Co. KG
>>>
>>> 2025
>>>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>>>> + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>>>> + * You may obtain a copy of the License at:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>>> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>>> + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
>>>> implied.
>>>> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>>> + * limitations under the License.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <config.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "openvswitch/compiler.h"
>>>> +#include "route-table-notify.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_run(bool *changed)
>>>> +{
>>>> + *changed = false;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_wait(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_add_watch_request(struct hmap *route_table_watches OVS_UNUSED,
>>>> + uint32_t table_id OVS_UNUSED) {
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_update_watches(struct hmap *route_table_watches
>>>> OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> +{
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> diff --git a/controller/route-table-notify.c
>>>> b/controller/route-table-notify.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000..0d931e133
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/controller/route-table-notify.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, STACKIT GmbH & Co. KG
>>>
>>> 2025
>>>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>>>> + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>>>> + * You may obtain a copy of the License at:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>>> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>>> + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
>>>> implied.
>>>> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>>> + * limitations under the License.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <config.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <net/if.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "netlink-notifier.h"
>>>> +#include "openvswitch/vlog.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "binding.h"
>>>> +#include "hash.h"
>>>> +#include "hmapx.h"
>>>> +#include "route-table.h"
>>>> +#include "route.h"
>>>> +#include "route-table-notify.h"
>>>> +#include "route-exchange-netlink.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(route_table_notify);
>>>> +
>>>> +struct route_table_watch_request {
>>>> + struct hmap_node node;
>>>> + uint32_t table_id;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct route_table_watch_entry {
>>>> + struct hmap_node node;
>>>> + uint32_t table_id;
>>>> + struct nln *nln;
>>>> + struct nln_notifier *route_notifier;
>>>> + struct nln_notifier *route6_notifier;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct hmap watches = HMAP_INITIALIZER(&watches);
>>>> +static bool any_route_table_changed;
>>>> +static struct route_table_msg rtmsg;
>>>> +
>>>> +static uint32_t
>>>> +route_table_notify_hash_watch(uint32_t table_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return hash_add(0, table_id);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_add_watch_request(struct hmap *route_table_watches,
>>>> + uint32_t table_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_request *wr = xzalloc(sizeof *wr);
>>>> + wr->table_id = table_id;
>>>> + hmap_insert(route_table_watches, &wr->node,
>>>> + route_table_notify_hash_watch(wr->table_id));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +route_table_change(const void *change_, void *aux OVS_UNUSED)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const struct route_table_msg *change = change_;
>>>> + if (change && change->rd.rtm_protocol != RTPROT_OVN) {
>>>> + any_route_table_changed = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> What do you think of this to avoid having to do en_route_exchange_run()
>>> for each and every host route table change?
>>>
>>> static void
>>> route_table_change(const void *change_, void *aux OVS_UNUSED)
>>> {
>>> const struct route_table_msg *change = change_;
>>> if (change && change->rd.rtm_protocol != RTPROT_OVN) {
>>> if (find_watch_entry(change->rd.rta_table_id)) {
>>> any_route_table_changed = true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>
> Yes that makes it significantly more efficient. I'll add that.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +add_watch_entry(uint32_t table_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_entry *we;
>>>> + uint32_t hash = route_table_notify_hash_watch(table_id);
>>>> + we = xzalloc(sizeof *we);
>>>> + we->table_id = table_id;
>>>> + VLOG_INFO("Registering new route table watcher for table %d.",
>>>> + table_id);
>>>> + we->nln = nln_create(NETLINK_ROUTE, route_table_parse, &rtmsg);
>>>> +
>>>> + we->route_notifier =
>>>> + nln_notifier_create(we->nln, RTNLGRP_IPV4_ROUTE,
>>>> + route_table_change, NULL);
>>>> + if (!we->route_notifier) {
>>>> + VLOG_WARN("Failed to create ipv4 route table watcher for "
>>
>> It's probably a good idea to rate limit this warning message.
>>
>>>> + "table %d. We will miss routing table updates.",
>>>> table_id);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + we->route6_notifier =
>>>> + nln_notifier_create(we->nln, RTNLGRP_IPV6_ROUTE,
>>>> + route_table_change, NULL);
>>>> + if (!we->route6_notifier) {
>>>> + VLOG_WARN("Failed to create ipv6 route table watcher for "
>>
>> It's probably a good idea to rate limit this warning message.
>>
>>>> + "table %d. We will miss routing table updates.",
>>>> table_id);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + hmap_insert(&watches, &we->node, hash);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +remove_watch_entry(struct route_table_watch_entry *we)
>>>> +{
>>>> + hmap_remove(&watches, &we->node);
>>>> + VLOG_INFO("Removing route table watcher for table %d.",
>>>> + we->table_id);
>>
>> Nit: fits on one line.
>>
>>>> + nln_notifier_destroy(we->route_notifier);
>>>> + nln_notifier_destroy(we->route6_notifier);
>>>> + nln_destroy(we->nln);
>>>> + free(we);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_run(bool *changed)
>>>> +{
>>>> + any_route_table_changed = false;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_entry *we;
>>>> + HMAP_FOR_EACH (we, node, &watches) {
>>>> + nln_run(we->nln);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + *changed = any_route_table_changed;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_wait(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_entry *we;
>>>> + HMAP_FOR_EACH (we, node, &watches) {
>>>> + nln_wait(we->nln);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct route_table_watch_entry*
>>>
>>> Nit: missing space before '*'.
>>>
>>>> +find_watch_entry(uint32_t table_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_entry *we;
>>>> + uint32_t hash = route_table_notify_hash_watch(table_id);
>>>> + HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH (we, node, hash, &watches) {
>>>> + if (table_id == we->table_id) {
>>>> + return we;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void
>>>> +route_table_notify_update_watches(struct hmap *route_table_watches)
>>
>> This should be 'const struct hmap *route_table_watches'.
>>
>> I know we remove from the map below but we don't have to. This is the
>> "desired" state we want to reconcile the host to.
>
> The thing is that this hmap is just passed to here and afterwards needs
> to be freed again. So i would leave this here, as we otherwise need to
> have a separate loop freeing everything.
>
Are you worried about performance? I don't really think that's an issue
here. However, I find it confusing that we're removing stuff from
something that's supposed to be "input" data. I still think we need to
pass the hmap as const * and clear it afterwards, in the caller. That's
in line with what we'd have to do if we implemented actual incremental
processing.
>>
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct hmapx sync_watches = HMAPX_INITIALIZER(&sync_watches);
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_entry *we;
>>>> + HMAP_FOR_EACH (we, node, &watches) {
>>>> + hmapx_add(&sync_watches, we);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + struct route_table_watch_request *wr;
>>>> + HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (wr, node, route_table_watches) {
>>>> + we = find_watch_entry(wr->table_id);
>>>> + if (we) {
>>>> + hmapx_find_and_delete(&sync_watches, we);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + add_watch_entry(wr->table_id);
>>>> + }
>>>> + hmap_remove(route_table_watches, &wr->node);
>>>> + free(wr);
>>
>> No need to remove here, so no need to free and that means
>> HMAP_FOR_EACH() is enough.
>>
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + struct hmapx_node *node;
>>>> + HMAPX_FOR_EACH (node, &sync_watches) {
>>>> + remove_watch_entry(node->data);
>>>> + }
>>
>> Kind of a nit because I assume exiting the process will probably cleanup
>> fine but shouldn't we remove all watch entries on exit like we do with
>> other resources?
>
> Yea, i'll add a *_destroy.
>
>>
>>>> +}
>>>> diff --git a/controller/route-table-notify.h
>>>> b/controller/route-table-notify.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000..b7211f6e7
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/controller/route-table-notify.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, STACKIT GmbH & Co. KG
>>>
>>> 2025
>>>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>>>> + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>>>> + * You may obtain a copy of the License at:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>>> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>>> + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
>>>> implied.
>>>> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>>> + * limitations under the License.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef ROUTE_TABLE_NOTIFY_H
>>>> +#define ROUTE_TABLE_NOTIFY_H 1
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>>> +#include "openvswitch/hmap.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Sets "changed" to true if any route table has changed enough that we
>>>> need
>>>> + * to learn new routes. */
>>>> +void route_table_notify_run(bool *changed);
>>
>> Why not just return true if any relevant table changed and false
>> otherwise? It feels a bit weird to do that through a 'bool *' argument.
>
> That came from your comment at
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/ae5de92e1880da09e7d27770f0b0a3214f0a2985.1735830931.git.felix.huettner@stackit.cloud/
> But maybe i misunderstood it?
>
> """
> Maybe it's a bit cleaner if we pass &rtn->changed to
> route_table_notify_run() instead of setting it here?
> """
>
> But i can change it back if you want.
>
In that version the code was:
+ if (route_table_notify_run()) {
+ struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn =
+ engine_get_internal_data(&en_route_table_notify);
+ if (rtn) {
+ rtn->changed = true;
+ }
+ }
+
In this version the caller is:
+ struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn =
+ engine_get_internal_data(&en_route_table_notify);
+ route_table_notify_run(&rtn->changed)
We could:
+ struct ed_type_route_table_notify *rtn =
+ engine_get_internal_data(&en_route_table_notify);
+ rtn->changed = route_table_notify_run()
What do you think?
Thanks,
Dumitru
> Thanks a lot,
> Felix
>
>>
>>>> +void route_table_notify_wait(void);
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Add a watch request to the hmap. The hmap should later be passed to
>>>> + * route_table_notify_update_watches*/
>>>> +void route_table_add_watch_request(struct hmap *route_table_watches,
>>>> + uint32_t table_id);
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Updates the list of route table watches that are currently active.
>>>> + * hmap should contain struct route_table_watch_request */
>>>> +void route_table_notify_update_watches(struct hmap *route_table_watches);
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* ROUTE_TABLE_NOTIFY_H */
>>>> diff --git a/tests/system-ovn.at b/tests/system-ovn.at
>>>> index ef43e242e..3f5672dad 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/system-ovn.at
>>>> +++ b/tests/system-ovn.at
>>>> @@ -15075,8 +15075,6 @@ blackhole 198.51.100.0/24 proto 84 metric 1000])
>>>> # Now we test route learning.
>>>> check_row_count Learned_Route 0
>>>> check ip route add 233.252.0.0/24 via 192.168.10.10 dev lo onlink vrf
>>>> ovnvrf1337
>>>> -# For now we trigger a recompute as route watching is not yet implemented.
>>>> -check ovn-appctl -t ovn-controller inc-engine/recompute
>>>> check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
>>>> check_row_count Learned_Route 1
>>>> lp=$(fetch_column port_binding _uuid logical_port=internet-phys)
>>>> @@ -15324,8 +15322,6 @@ blackhole 198.51.100.0/24 proto 84 metric 1000])
>>>> # Now we test route learning.
>>>> check_row_count Learned_Route 0
>>>> check ip route add 233.252.0.0/24 via 192.168.10.10 dev lo onlink vrf
>>>> ovnvrf1337
>>>> -# For now we trigger a recompute as route watching is not yet implemented.
>>>> -check ovn-appctl -t ovn-controller inc-engine/recompute
>>>> check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
>>>> check_row_count Learned_Route 1
>>>> lp=$(fetch_column port_binding _uuid logical_port=internet-phys)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dumitru
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
