On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 16:20, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 75m band, I think? If it is really 75m high, someone should already have done
> deep thinking about lightning...

Oh, it's not 75m high...  I got the units screwed up going back and
forth.  I originally said 75 ft, then someone said 25m, and I came
back with 75m.  Regardless, it's not up, it's out.  It'll be about 4m
up.

> So I don't think the optocouplers in the AAG equipment are for lightning
> protection. They are for ground separation -- otherwise there would be a
> noise-inducing ground loop between the PC, which *always* connects signal
> ground to protective earth (major design flaw) and an auxiliary-powered
> sensor outside.

As I said, it's not direct lightning I think I can protect myself from
this way, but nearby lightning.  Also, as you've mentioned now, ground
loops.  Ug...  I knew I was trying to do the right thing, just
apparently for the wrong reasons...

Rob

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables 
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine 
for externally facing server and web deployment. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to