On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:42:53PM +0100, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 14.01.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> > 
> > There's an issue reported by Fedora user: 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229231
> > 
> > 
> > Workaround is to explicitly ensure that wire and ds2490 modules are
> > not loaded (using blacklist in modprobe).  Owfs works without the
> > wire module by accessing the device via usblib (ie use -u instead of
> > -w1 option to owfs or owserver).
> > 
> > My guess is that there's a contention that arises between the wire
> > module and the USB sub system when the one-wire device is accessed. 
> > ---
> > 
> > That's it. Do you have any idea how to proceed? Thanks,
> > 
> 
> Well, yes. When I read the first two paragraphs, I was about to give you
> exactly this answer from the last two paragraphs. This is due to a
> conflict between the ds2490 kernel module and libusb.
> 
> There is no way we can fix this in owfs. When the w1 kernel module
> claims a device, it will lock any user process out. The user either has
> to disable the ds2490 kernel module or actually use it by specifying
> --w1 instead of --usb.

  Thank you very much!

-- 
Tomasz Torcz               RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile.
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl     Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to