OK, have you tried these queries in the Workbench?
What's with the quotes?
I see no close bracket on:
(1) [...] "<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> rdf:type ?z"+
and
(3) [...] "<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> ?y ?z"+
And the quote is outside the bracket (not sure how this could even Java
parse) in:
(2) [...] "<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> rdf:type ?z"+}
Could I take a fuller look at the code, or at the data?
Barry
On 13/03/13 18:05, Carlo Allocca wrote:
Hi Barry and ALL,
I am having the same problem also with the version 5.3. Here the report:
1) "SELECT Distinct *" +
"WHERE { " +
"<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> rdf:type ?z"+
Results:
z
---------------------------------------------
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#TLOSpecies
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#WoRMSSpeciesType
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#BioticElementType
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#PhysicalObjectType
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#TLO_Entity_Type
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#WoRMSBioticElementType
2) "SELECT Distinct ?z" +
"WHERE { " +
"<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> rdf:type ?z"+}
Results:
---------------------------------------------
18:06:46 1 result(s) in 37ms.
I should see at least one.
3) "SELECT Distinct ?y ?z" +
"WHERE { " +
"<WoRMS:159343/Thunnus_atlanticus> ?y ?z"+
Results:
y
---------------------------------------------
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#belongsTo
18:08:45 2 result(s) in 345ms.
Why not ?z
Any help on this?Please.
Regards,
Carlo
--- *Mer 13/3/13, Barry Norton /<barry.nor...@ontotext.com>/* ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
Oggetto: Re:
A: "Carlo Allocca" <carloallo...@yahoo.it>
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
Data: Mercoledì 13 marzo 2013, 16:16
Carlo, is there a motivation for using such an old version of OWLIM?
I'm sure one of the devs could, but I'd not be keen to go so far
back to duplicate and diagnose your problem.
Barry
On 13/03/13 15:13, Carlo Allocca wrote:
Hi All,
I am using BigOWLIM 3.2 as jar and everything is working fine,
except the following:
1) I run a very simple query such as:
"PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> " +
"SELECT Distinct ?z" +
"WHERE { " +
"<WoRMS:403218/WoRMS:127027/Thunnus_albacores> rdf:type ?z"+"}"
and I got no answer.
2) I run the "almost same query (changed ?z to *)"
"PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> " +
"SELECT Distinct * " +
"WHERE { " +
"<WoRMS:403218/WoRMS:127027/Thunnus_albacores> rdf:type ?z"+"}"
and I got the reselts i wanted:
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#TLOSpecies]
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#WoRMSSpeciesType]
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#BioticElementType]
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#PhysicalObjectType]
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#TLO_Entity_Type]
[z=http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#WoRMSBioticElementType]
It is very strange for me.
Does anybody can help me on this?
Here I report the main configuration file info:
[] a rep:Repository ;
rep:repositoryID "owlim" ;
rdfs:label "TLO Testing" ;
rep:repositoryImpl [
rep:repositoryType "openrdf:SailRepository" ;
sr:sailImpl [
owlim:ruleset "owl-max" ;
owlim:entity-index-size "5000000" ;
owlim:cache-size "3000" ;
sail:sailType "owlim:Sail" ;
owlim:partialRDFS "true" ;
owlim:noPersist "false" ;
owlim:storage-folder "TLOBigOwlimStorage" ;
owlim:base-URL "http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#";
<http://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#> ;
owlim:repository-type "file-repository" ;
owlim:console-thread "false"
]
].
Thank you very much for your help, please.
Best,
Carlo
--- *Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton /<barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>/* ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
Oggetto: Re: [Owlim-discussion] setting Ruleset owlim
repository using sesame workbench
A: "Carlo Allocca" <carloallo...@yahoo.it>
</mc/compose?to=carloallo...@yahoo.it>
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
</mc/compose?to=owlim-discussion@ontotext.com>
Data: Giovedì 7 marzo 2013, 18:58
Yeah, I got caught out by 'doing things properly'. If you've
not added any data you won't do any harm by changing the
ruleset post-creation (I guess as long as you restart to
compile the new ruleset then add data)
B
----- Reply message -----
From: "Carlo Allocca" <carloallo...@yahoo.it>
</mc/compose?to=carloallo...@yahoo.it>
To: "Barry Norton" <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
Cc: <owlim-discussion@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=owlim-discussion@ontotext.com>
Subject: [Owlim-discussion] setting Ruleset owlim repository
using sesame workbench
Date: Thu, Mar 7, 2013 5:10 PM
Hello Barry,
while you wrote me I was doing what you suggested in the
previous email and I did it. It is working fine doing it
using Sesame workbench.
One more, following the link
http://owlim.ontotext.com/display/OWLIMv53/OWLIM+FAQ#OWLIMFAQ-HowdoIchangetheconfigurationofanOWLIMSesamerepositoryafterithasbeencreated%3F
as you suggester earlier, it is written explicitly that
"...but there are other parameters that can not be changed
once the
repository is created, e.g. the rule-set (in the case of
OWLIM-SE)."
I read it after i run the query, but it is working!!!.
Many Thanks,
Regards,
Carlo
--- Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com> ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
Oggetto: Re: [Owlim-discussion] setting Ruleset owlim
repository using sesame workbench
A: "Carlo Allocca" <carloallo...@yahoo.it>
</mc/compose?to=carloallo...@yahoo.it>
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
</mc/compose?to=owlim-discussion@ontotext.com>
Data: Giovedì 7 marzo 2013, 16:25
Sorry, no, not with the Sesame Workbench.
The OWLIM Workbench has a field where you can fill this
in, but
that's also a change in way of doing things...
Barry
On 07/03/2013 14:14, Carlo Allocca wrote:
Hi Barry,
thank you for your reply. As I have to prepare a
demo
very soon (less than one week time), the only
parameter
i need is ruleset as i need to use customized
rules.
Any suggestion using sesame workbench?
Carlo
--- Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton
<barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton <barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
</mc/compose?to=barry.nor...@ontotext.com>
Oggetto: Re: [Owlim-discussion] setting
Ruleset owlim
repository using sesame workbench
A: "Carlo Allocca" <carloallo...@yahoo.it>
</mc/compose?to=carloallo...@yahoo.it>
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
</mc/compose?to=owlim-discussion@ontotext.com>
Data: Giovedì 7 marzo 2013, 14:39
Carlo, I'd personally avoid using the
Workbench
if you've significant parameters to set.
In the getting-started/ folder of the
distribution you'll find a set of
parameters in
owlim.ttl, which you can copy and
edit. One can
either instantiate a repository these
with using
GettingStarted.jar (which will also help you
load ontologies and data), or can push it
directly to your live Sesame endpoint
over its
HTTP interface with curl (my preference).
Barry
On 07/03/2013 13:33, Carlo Allocca wrote:
Dear
All,
it is again me. I would like
to ask
the following:
I creating a new OWLIM-SE
repository with sesame workbench and
my question is:
How Can I set "RulesSet" with
myfile.pie ?
I have done it using OWLIM as java
library, but how to do it using sesame
workbench?
Thank you very much for your
help.
Regards,
Carlo
_______________________________________________
Owlim-discussion mailing list
Owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
