>> We hope someone will find it useful. Please note that this URL is temporary 
>> and will change in the future.
> Cool, thanks a lot. Do you plan to provide these one-shot or on the longer 
> run? In this case, it would make sense to subscribe to the 
> [email protected] list, to get packaging related information in time.

Not sure about the future but 1.2.4 client is in this repository already ;-)

kuba

--


>> 
>> Qt client evolution: for Qt 4.8 it should possible to work it out for us. 
>> For Qt 5 it would be much more problematic. Jarek (CC) has more details.
> Yes, we're not planning to go with Qt5 in forseeable future.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Klaas
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Jakub Moscicki 
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> just as a heads-up: We are about to drop support for Desktop platforms with 
>> Qt 4.6 for the ownCloud client, since it limits us considerably. This 
>> affects Debian 6 and RHEL/CentOS 6. For Debian it's not a problem, since 
>> Debian 7 will hopefully declared stable soon, but I see no such remedy for 
>> RHEL, since RedHat probably won't update Qt within the RHEL lifecycle. This 
>> means that in order to keep RHEL 6 supported, we would need to find some way 
>> to ship Qt 4.8 along.
>> 
>> Is there a significant amount of people using RHEL/CentOS on the client side?
>> 
>> We are currently only evaluating and testing owncloud for CERN use and hence 
>> there is no production service and users depending on it.
>> 
>> Otherwise, we are talking about ~5K users on site and ~10K users worldwide. 
>> RHEL is probably 30% of it (just a guess).
>> 
>> I have forwarded your comments on Qt / RHEL to our experts to see what they 
>> think about it.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> kuba
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> Am 11.04.2013 um 11:43 schrieb Jakub Moscicki:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Thanks for the hints. I am by no means expert in packaging, however, 
>> friendly people at CERN are and they have built the rpm for slc6 (redhat 6) 
>> with Koji and SLC build systems using Fedors 18 srpm as a source.
>> We are currently testing it and will give it back to community as soon as we 
>> can.
>> 
>> kuba
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Klaas Freitag 
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 10.04.2013 14:36, Jakub Moscicki wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> I am looking for owncloud-client 1.2.3  RPM (or source RPM to build locally) 
>> for RHEL (or CentOS-6 which would do fine).
>> 
>> Unfortunately the SUSE system does only have the old client for this 
>> platform (http://software.opensuse.org/package/owncloud-client). Since the 
>> release schedule is very agile I don't find these in "standard" sources 
>> (rpmfind etc).
>> 
>> I am not so familiar with the build/distribution process of owncloud, so I 
>> would appreciate some pointers… Who is actually packaging this and how is 
>> this triggered?
>> 
>> We are building the client in the Open Build Service, what you named the 
>> "SUSE system". Unfortunately the RHEL build currently fails, yet that 
>> probably could be fixed. It's just a matter of doing it. [2] gives more 
>> information on how to collaborate.
>> 
>> So if you might be experienced in packaging, especially on the RHEL 
>> platform, we would appreciate some help. There is a mailinglist 
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> which discusses 
>> packaging topics, you can join via [1].
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> Klaas
>> 
>> [1] http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>> [2] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Owncloud mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud

_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud

Reply via email to