I know what XP Mode is, Virtual PC by itself is worse than the XP Mode implementation of it.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 3:44 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: RE: [OT] Virtual machine alternatives What do you think XP Mode is? Cheers Ken From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Chris Walsh Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 1:28 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: RE: [OT] Virtual machine alternatives Haha, when one talks about Virtualization, one shouldn't mention Virtual PC. *shudders* From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Craig van Nieuwkerk Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 3:26 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] Virtual machine alternatives Unless you are comparing to Microsoft Virtual PC in which case VirtualBox performance is outstanding! On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Chris Walsh <ch...@walshie.me<mailto:ch...@walshie.me>> wrote: Virtual box is okish, but when you're looking for semi decent perf I wouldn't bother.
