Sorry Michael I don't know - I've not touched ASP.NET (except for WCF) for years.
On 13 June 2012 18:58, Michael Ridland <rid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With that you can also use a distributed session state. > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Preet Sangha <preetsan...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I've not done this, but I'm wondering if you can just use two virtual >> directories each with a different WebApplication framework/type? And >> Hyperlink between them? You can upgrade the old pages as time allows, and >> as time allows add new functionality the 3.5 application? >> >> >> On 13 June 2012 17:04, Grant Molloy <graken...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all.. >>> >>> So my boss came to me yesterday and asks me to look into and build a >>> prototype for an ASP.Net 3.5 web app which would need to act as a container >>> for an ancient ASP.Net 1.0 app.. >>> 1.0 app is well and truely past due for life cycling, but org doesn't >>> want to do big bang tech refresh, as have recently had fingers burnt on >>> another! >>> >>> The request... >>> "The prefered approach would be to come up with a solution that allows >>> existing functionality to remain 'as-is' and new functionality to be >>> developed in .Net 3.5. >>> Over time existing functionality can be upgraded (from 1.0 to 3.5) as >>> the need arises. >>> >>> Can you look at building a simple prototype in 3.5 that acts as a >>> container to 'Project ABC' web presentation functionality? The focus would >>> be to identify possible options for integration between 3.5 and 1.0 at a >>> presentation level.. Some key challenges include >>> * how to host 1.0 components within a 3.5 container >>> * how to integrate navigation from UIP (3.5) to 1.0 model >>> * how to sync data between 3.5 and 1.0 (eg. Session state) >>> * how to best isolate 1.0 functionality to allow clean separation from a >>> maintenance perspective, as well as ease to be able to upgrade any piece of >>> 1.0 functionality independently of other functionality. " >>> >>> As I'm waiting for my environment to be commissioned, I've been >>> fruitlessly scouring the web. It seems like the web has cleansed itself of >>> most. Net 1.0 info!! >>> >>> Has anyone out there faced and defeated (or turned and run away >>> screaming for their mummy) this type of beast? >>> >>> Can you use. Net 1.0 user controls in 3.5? >>> >>> Grant >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> regards, >> Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland >> > > > > -- > > *Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital* > Managing Director > P. 0404 865 350 > E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au > W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au > T. www.twitter.com/rid00z > L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland > > > <http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland> > > -- regards, Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland
