We have no intention on delivering a x64 version. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Craig van Nieuwkerk Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 2:05 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Does anybody know why the visual studio 2012 developer command prompt points to a 32-bit path when on a 64-bit OS?
When I download from MSDN it only lists 32 bit versions. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:02 AM, mike smith <meski...@gmail.com<mailto:meski...@gmail.com>> wrote: I thought there was an intent to release an x64 version this time around, but a fast google didn't show one. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Katherine Moss <katherine.m...@gordon.edu<mailto:katherine.m...@gordon.edu>> wrote: Dang, it shouldn't be. What was Microsoft on when they made that decision? LOL. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>] On Behalf Of Craig van Nieuwkerk Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:10 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Does anybody know why the visual studio 2012 developer command prompt points to a 32-bit path when on a 64-bit OS? AFAIK, Visual Studio is still a 32bit application, so possibly related. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Katherine Moss <katherine.m...@gordon.edu<mailto:katherine.m...@gordon.edu>> wrote: I was wondering if this is the case with anyone else using the 64 bit version of Windows 8, it's the case for me, and I think that if the OS is 64 bit, then shouldn't most of the tools and applications running on it also be? Thanks for your input. -- Meski http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
