On 4 May 2013 11:14, David Burstin <david.burs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 04/05/2013 11:25 AM, "Tristan Reeves" <tree...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "full featured" meaning, um, not full featured. Or at least not if you >> consider having any plugin work with VS a "feature". LOL. Ah >> Microsoft, gotta love 'em. > > <rant> > Yeah. Gotta love that they provide an excellent development environment at a > fair price and then provide a free version that also gives a great > development experience. Or did you want the free version to be exactly the > same as the paid version? > > This whole freetard sense of entitlement gives me the sh*ts. > </rant>
I agree with David's rant, though I do also see Tristan issue, in that the free version is clearly nobbled because you can't access the expansion points that are clearly still there. -- Regards, Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)
