That was the ramp up phase though. It was always going to take some time to ramp up. Look at what the alternative gave us: a two year delay and a network that's not fit for purpose. Even if they kept the old network and simply rolled it out slower we would have been better off. In fact, I think that's what people really wanted - better management. But we didn't end up getting that, the Liberals simply showed us they were just as bad if not worse at managing that project than Labor. Who would have thought?
On 5 Jan 2018 11:54 AM, "Greg Low" <[email protected]> wrote: > I remember well the day he proudly announced that his fibre had now passed > 1000 houses in Perth. Someone asked him how many could actually connect. > Eventually the answer was 16. > > > > Regards, > > > > Greg > > > > Dr Greg Low > > > > 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 > fax > > SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com |http://greglow.me > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ > ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *David Connors > *Sent:* Friday, 5 January 2018 3:49 PM > *To:* ozDotNet <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Internet use on 4G LTE > > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 at 14:45 Tony Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > The hilarity of Labor being better negotiators, and the libs capitulating > and handing over money they didn't have to. > > > > Oh they handed over a crap load of money. I think given the choice Telstra > would have done no deal at all, except for the strategic importance of RF > spectrum. > > > > Conroy isn't exactly a respected figure. In retrospect, maybe he and > Telstra were a match made in heaven. > > > > http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/government-it/senators-red- > undie-remarks-fall-flat-in-new-york-20120928-26pqt.html > > > > > > -- > > David Connors > [email protected] | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors > | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363 >
