Rather than drawings to code, I want C# code to diagrams.  I had a play
with Resharper's Type Dependency diagrams but the result is more for
programmers.
I need something that displays a class in a form that promotes discussion
in the "Ubiquitous Language"

For Example a Car with four Wheel properties.


On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:21 AM, djones147 <djones...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I use mermaidjs  to do simple graphs and diagrams.
>
> Davy
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Ian Thomas <il.tho...@outlook.com>
> Date: 05/02/2018 23:11 (GMT+01:00)
> To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
> Subject: RE: Class diagrams and tools for communicating with clients
>
> Perhaps consider Ink to Code ? It’s the converse of your approach, but may
> help with client understanding.
>
>
>
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/01/with-ink-to-
> code-microsoft-is-turning-back-of-napkin-sketches-into-software/
>
>
>
> It’s a Microsoft Garage project, from Microsoft Store, not available here
> yet? (I haven’t checked)
>
>
>
> ILT
>
> Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia
>
>
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@
> ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *kirsten greed
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 6 February 2018 8:22 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
> *Subject:* Class diagrams and tools for communicating with clients
>
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> After revisiting "Domain Driven Design"
>
> I want to try using class diagrams to communicate with my client.
>
> However my classes are cluttered with internal properties that are not
> relevant to our conversations
>
>
>
> I thought of trying interfaces for example
>
>
>
>
>
> public interface ISnapInModel
>
>             {
>
>
>
>                         IBlank Blank { get;  set;  }
>
>         }
>
>
>
> public interface IBlank
>
>       {
>
>             public int Height {get;set;}
>
>             public int Width {get;set;}
>
>       }
>
>
>
>
>
> However when I try to create a class diagram in VS2017 no association
> draws between the two interfaces.
>
>
>
> Is there a better way?
>
> Thank you
>
>
>

Reply via email to