Same with us, Jo. We queried that out 10's were a bad batch and commenced using 2 lots of 5's. -----Original Message----- From: JoFromOz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:22 AM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] 3rd Stage Feedback
>We had ours recalled. Used 2x 5IU synto instead. > >Jo > >Robbie Moon wrote: >> bodgy synto? Hmm that's interesting. The hospital where i work has >> had an appalling number of pph's recently also. We were counting >> about 2 a week in the vicinity of 2-3 litres. I've never seen >> anything like it. >> If what you say is true, then it can surely only be the active >> management that precipitates it. >> >> how did you find out it was bodgy? >> >> Robin >> >> >> >>> Ross W Timbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Denise >>> >>> Yes. At the hospital where I work all the women are public - no >>> private at all. Nearly all women go through midwives' clinic & see >>> the same midwife throughout the pregnancy. Third stage is discussed >>> with all of them, and they are given a pamphlet that lists the pros & >>> cons of active & physiological. >>> A lot of women opt for physiologic - but the majority probably still >>> choose active management. >>> As an interesting aside, we went through a patch a while back where >>> we had an unusually large number of PPHs. Just found out recently >>> that we had a bodgy batch of syntocinon. Perhaps it was the CCT >>> that was used with the ineffective synto that caused these PPHs. >>> Another point in favour of physiologic 3rd stage! >>> >>> Jacky > >-- >Babies are Born... Pizzas are delivered. > >-- >This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. >Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
