I have another question, this time regarding the
routine collection of cord blood. In previous places I have worked, we
only collected it for RH negative women or those with no antenatal blood results
available. Even if the woman was RPR positive, the doctors would still
bleed the baby to get a more accurate result instead of relying on the results
of the cord blood. There were no other indications for collecting
it.
At the place I now work, we are still collecting it
on every patient and they are all being tested for group and coombs
etc. This seems a total waste of time and money to me as well as an
unnecessary occupational safety risk to staff.
The only other reason I see to
justify collecting it would be if it could be used in a cord blood
bank? Does anyone know if this is the case?
Looking forward to some more
advice....
Helen Cahill
|
- [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and testing of cor... Helen and Graham
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and testi... JoFromOz
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and t... Julia Vaughan
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and testi... Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and t... Lindsay Kennedy
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and t... Megan Woodman-Browning
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection a... lisa chalmers
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection a... Susan Cudlipp
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and testi... Ken WArd