The thing that surprises me is that most of my friends have exclusively 
breastfed and produced babies with rolls on their rolls and crevices so deep 
you can't find the bottom of them... My own daughter was off the chart at 6 
months (she was exclusively breastfed until somewhere around 16 months). They 
did generally seem to look different to chubby formula babies though, sort of 
softer looking fat.

At 10:42 AM +0800 25/4/06, Susan Cudlipp wrote:
>This is interesting Kelly and about time these wretched charts were consigned 
>to the bin.
>I did a lactation course a few years ago and the facilitator asked us to all 
>bring in our own babies health records, some of which were very old!  It was 
>obvious that all of us who had breast fed produced babies with very different 
>growth patterns to that specified on the chart. She explained about the growth 
>being based on formula feeding, which was something most of us were unaware of.
>Regards,
>Sue
>"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do 
>nothing"
>Edmund Burke
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Kelly @ BellyBelly
>To: <mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au>ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
>Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:13 AM
>Subject: [ozmidwifery] Breastfeeding Mothers Given Wrong Advice for 40 Years
>
>Breastfeeding evolution in Britain - WHO changes guidelines...
>
><http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2147863,00.html>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2147863,00.html
>Mothers got wrong advice for 40 yearsSarah-Kate Templeton, Medical 
>Correspondent
>
>BREAST-FEEDING mothers have been given potentially harmful advice on infant 
>nutrition for the past 40 years, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has 
>admitted.
>
>Charts used in Britain for decades to advise mothers on a baby's optimum size 
>have been based on the growth rates of infants fed on formula milk.
>
>The organisation now says the advice given to millions of breast-feeding 
>mothers was distorted because babies fed on formula milk put on weight far 
>faster.
>
>These breast-feeding mothers were wrongly told that their babies were 
>underweight and were advised, or felt pressured, to fatten them up by giving 
>them formula milk or extra solids.
>
>Health experts believe the growth charts may have contributed to childhood 
>obesity and associated problems such as diabetes and heart disease in later 
>life. A government study has found that more than a quarter of children in 
>English secondary schools are clinically obese, almost double the proportion a 
>decade ago.
>
>This week, the WHO will publish new growth standards based on a study of more 
>than 8,000 breast-fed babies from six countries around the world. They will 
>say the optimum size is that of a breast-fed baby.
>
>The move will put pressure on British doctors to replace charts which, for the 
>last four decades, have taken into account the growth patterns of bottle-fed 
>babies.
>
>Professor Tim Cole, of the Institute of Child Health at University College 
>London, said: "We should change to a growth chart based on breast-fed babies. 
>During their first year they do not put on as much weight as those fed on 
>formula milk. Breast-fed babies are less likely to be fat later in life and to 
>develop complications such as diabetes and heart disease."
>
>Six years ago, Cole developed an alternative chart based on breast-fed babies 
>but it has never been endorsed by the British medical establishment. The Child 
>Growth Foundation, a UK charity, campaigns for the adoption of Cole's chart.
>
>The foundation claims breast-fed babies are, on average, at 22lb at 12 months, 
>about 1lb lighter than those fed solely on formula milk. It is thought that 
>breast-fed babies grow more slowly in the first year because they control the 
>rate at which they feed, rather than being tied to their parents' notion of 
>meal times.
>
>Mercedes de Onis, who co-ordinates WHO child growth standards, said: 
>"Breast-fed babies appear to self-regulate their energy intake to lower
>levels. Breast-fed babies have different metabolic rates and different 
>sleeping patterns. Formula-fed babies seem to have higher intakes of energy 
>and, as a result, are heavier."
>
>The American Academy of Pediatrics has warned that being overweight as a baby 
>is a key early risk factor for heart disease and diabetes.
>
>The babies who were the models for the new WHO standards were selected for 
>good health. They were all breast-fed, their mothers did not smoke and they 
>received good health care.
>
>The WHO says babies should be fed solely on breast milk for up to six months. 
>In Britain, fewer than 10% of babies are getting only breast milk by this age.
>
>The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health is to meet this summer to 
>discuss the new WHO standards.
>
>The Department of Health said: "Once WHO publishes the new growth charts we 
>will assess the need for revisions to the UK growth charts."
> 
>Best Regards,
>
>Kelly Zantey
>Creator, <http://www.bellybelly.com.au/>BellyBelly.com.au
>Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
><http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support>BellyBelly Birth Support - 
>http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
> 
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.6/323 - Release Date: 24/04/2006


-- 
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to