I know I haven't actually read this whole article but I have read the
title and intro....

PLEASE!!! Why can they NOT stop blaming women for cs rates?????   You
are too posh; too young; too old; 
too indigenous; too fat; too risky; too stupid.....

I don’t actually see the women with scalpels in their hands here
people!!!  

THE DOCTORS MAKE THE DECISIONS !!

THE DOCTORS MAKE THE INCISIONS!!!

GRR GRR GRR GRR!!!!





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leanne wynne
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:26 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] article FYI


C-Section Rates: Obesity to Blame?
Patient Requests May Not Be Major Factor in Growing Number of C-Sections
By Charlene  Laino WebMD Medical News

Reviewed By Louise Chang, MD0 on Tuesday, May 09, 2006

May 9, 2006 (Washington) -- Contrary to what many believe, patient
requests 
are probably not the main driving force behind the increasing rates of 
cesarean births in the U.S., doctors say.

Rather, obesity is probably to blame for much of the rise, says Frederic

Frigoletto Jr., MD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Harvard 
Medical School in Boston.

The doctors acknowledge that some pregnant women ask their doctors for 
C-sections because of the increased convenience of choosing the time of 
delivery and because of a desire for less painful childbirth.

A National Institutes of Health task force found some increase in
patients' 
requests. "But it certainly didn't account for the sharp increase in 
cesarean deliveries," says Mary D'Alton, MD, chairwoman of obstetrics
and 
gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center in New York.

Frigoletto says his research suggests that the increase in cesarean 
deliveries coincides with the epidemic of obesity in this country.

Obese women are at risk for pregnancy-related complications, including 
hypertension , gestational diabetes, and blood clots, all of which may
lead 
to a recommendation for cesarean delivery, he says.

The experts discussed the rising C-section rates at a news conference at
the 
annual meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists 
(ACOG).

C-Sections at All-Time High

By 2004, the number of C-sections had reached an all-time high,
accounting 
for 29% of all births -- or 1 million babies -- according to the latest
data 
from the National Center for Health Statistics.

That's in contrast to a 5% rate after World War II, a number that
remained 
relatively stable until it skyrocketed to 15% in the 1970s.

C-sections continued to gain popularity until the early 1990s, by which
time 
22% of babies were delivered by cesarean.

Then reports that women who had undergone a first cesarean delivery
might 
not need a cesarean the next time around led the rate to fall back to
below 
20%.

But this was soon proven false "with studies in the mid-1990s indicating

that attempts for a vaginal delivery after a cesarean was dangerous for
the 
mother," says Stanley Zinberg, MD, deputy executive vice president of
ACOG. 
And so the number rose again.

While ACOG has no formal position on maternal-requested C-sections,
D'Alton 
says that elective procedures should not be performed before 39 weeks of

gestation unless there is a medical reason to do so.

D'Alton also stresses that women should not have more than three or four

cesarean births. Repeated C-sections increase the risk of dangerous 
placental abnormalities in later pregnancies, she explains. More
first-time 
cesareans are now increasing the rate of repeat surgeries later, each of

which carries progressively higher risks to both mother and newborn.

Doctors are seeing more severe life-threatening complications in which
the 
placenta fails to detach from the uterus because it sticks to scars from

previous cesareans in women who have had previous cesarean deliveries,
she 
says.

According to Zinberg, younger women are at less risk of
C-section-associated 
complications.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

SOURCES: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists annual
meeting, 
Washington D.C., May 6-10, 2006. Frederic Frigoletto Jr., MD, professor
of 
obstetrics and gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Mary D'Alton,
MD, 
chairman of obstetrics and gynecology, Columbia University Medical
Center, 
New York. Stanley Zinberg, MD, deputy executive vice president, ACOG.
News 
release, ACOG.

© 2006 WebMD Inc. All rights reserved



Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of "Women's Business"
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006
 

-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006
 
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to