I remember a lecture at uni also saying that up to 75% of newborns have tiny, 
seemingly harmless,  haemorrage near the brain or in between any of the 
membranes.  It did make me wonder if there were any implications for the Vit K 
debate.

Suzi
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ken Ward 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 9:37 PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Article about natural birth and brain haemorrhage


  It has shown that the bleeds can be considered 'normal' so may help to reduce 
legal action when a child does not develop normally. 
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alesa Koziol
    Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 5:41 PM
    To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
    Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Article about natural birth and brain haemorrhage


    Pardon my scepticism but what exactly did this "research" prove? With so 
many variables I am surprised that any conclusions could be drawn!
    Alesa 

      Haven't they got anything better to research??!!

      Helen
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,2001561,00.html
      One in four natural births causes brain haemorrhage
      Ian Sample
      Tuesday January 30, 2007
      The Guardian 
      Giving birth naturally increases the risk of minor brain haemorrhages in 
newborn babies, according to a study. Brain scans of babies aged between one 
and five weeks showed small ruptures in blood vessels in or around the brain 
are common, affecting one in four children born naturally. 
      Babies delivered by caesarean section showed no signs of even minor 
bleeding. 

      In most cases, the haemorrhages are harmless and heal naturally, but 
larger ruptures can affect brain development, leading to seizures, or problems 
with learning or coordination. 


      Doctors at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, used magnetic 
resonance imaging (MRI) to scan 88 healthy newborns. Of the 65 delivered 
naturally, 17 had intracranial haemorrhages and seven had ruptures in at least 
two separate regions. 
      John Gilmore, a professor of psychiatry and lead scientist on the study, 
said the bleeding was not caused by the size of the baby or the baby's head, 
the duration of labour, or the use of vacuum or forceps to assist delivery. 
"The bleeds are probably caused by pressure on the skull during delivery," he 
said. 

      The scientists noticed the high rate of haemorrhages while conducting 
scans to assess brain development in children perceived to be at high risk of 
mental disorders. "What we've shown is that if you get these bleeds, you don't 
have to think something has gone wrong with the delivery, because these are 
common," said Prof Gilmore, whose study is published in Radiology. 

      The team will conduct further scans when the babies are one and two years 
old. This may help doctors assess future cases of "shaken baby syndrome", where 
injuries to a baby are contested. In some cases, parents or guardians claim 
brain injuries have been inflicted naturally at birth. The scans may reveal 
whether small haemorrhages at birth grow to become more threatening, or 
gradually heal with time.
      Special reports
      Medicine and health

      Useful links
      British Medical Association
      Department of Health
      General Medical Council
      Health on the Net Foundation
      Institute of Cancer Research
      Medical Research Council
      NHS Direct
      Royal Institute of Public Health
      World Health Organisation

Reply via email to