As I just posted on Paul's blog, maybe it's all a matter of perspective?   
Seems logical that within a Silverlight technical group like this that you'd 
focus on things down at that level of detail.  From a different perspective you 
could easily see a lack of focus on any of these technologies?  Here's the type 
of view I mean:
     http://twitpic.com/32us7s


Darren neimkedarren.nei...@live.com 




From: m...@miguelmadero.com
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:34:52 +1100
Subject: Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?
To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com

Nice post. But I'm not sure MS is pushing that much (or even that little) for 
WPF internally or externally. 



On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com> wrote:


I took the liberty of graphing this:
http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job







On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Price <step...@littlevoices.com> wrote:



Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies?

*feigned shocked look*



I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for

ages. Nothing changed here.



Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :)



On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <m...@miguelmadero.com> wrote:

> I like how Shawn puts it,

>>

>> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites.

>

> That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases for

> Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not much

> different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other

> devices (maybe?).

>

>

>

>

> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com> wrote:

>>

>> ...at least for non-phones:

>> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/

>>

>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834




>> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate

>> Paul

>> _______________________________________________

>> ozsilverlight mailing list

>> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com

>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

>>

>

>

>

> --

> Miguel A. Madero Reyes

> www.miguelmadero.com (blog)

> m...@miguelmadero.com

>

> _______________________________________________

> ozsilverlight mailing list

> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com

> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

>

>

_______________________________________________

ozsilverlight mailing list

ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com

http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight



-- 
Paul Stovell


_______________________________________________

ozsilverlight mailing list

ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com

http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight




-- 
Miguel A. Madero Reyes
www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
m...@miguelmadero.com



_______________________________________________
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight                    
                  
_______________________________________________
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

Reply via email to