I notice "Mobile" is missing from your graph. What are you telling us Darren? :)
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darren Neimke <darren.nei...@live.com>wrote: > As I just posted on Paul's blog, maybe it's all a matter of perspective? > [image: > Smile] Seems logical that within a Silverlight technical group like this > that you'd focus on things down at that level of detail. From a different > perspective you could easily see a lack of focus on any of these > technologies? Here's the type of view I mean: > > http://twitpic.com/32us7s > > > > Darren Neimke > darren.nei...@live.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > From: m...@miguelmadero.com > Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:34:52 +1100 > > Subject: Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet? > To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > > Nice post. But I'm not sure MS is pushing that much (or even that little) > for WPF internally or externally. > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com> wrote: > > I took the liberty of graphing this: > > http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Price > <step...@littlevoices.com>wrote: > > Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies? > *feigned shocked look* > > I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for > ages. Nothing changed here. > > Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :) > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <m...@miguelmadero.com> wrote: > > I like how Shawn puts it, > >> > >> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites. > > > > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases > for > > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not > much > > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other > > devices (maybe?). > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com> > wrote: > >> > >> ...at least for non-phones: > >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/ > >> > >> > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834 > >> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate > >> Paul > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ozsilverlight mailing list > >> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > > m...@miguelmadero.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ozsilverlight mailing list > > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > > > > -- > Paul Stovell > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > > > > -- > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > m...@miguelmadero.com > > _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > -- Paul Stovell
_______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight