I notice "Mobile" is missing from your graph. What are you telling us
Darren? :)



On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darren Neimke <darren.nei...@live.com>wrote:

>  As I just posted on Paul's blog, maybe it's all a matter of perspective? 
> [image:
> Smile]  Seems logical that within a Silverlight technical group like this
> that you'd focus on things down at that level of detail.  From a different
> perspective you could easily see a lack of focus on any of these
> technologies?  Here's the type of view I mean:
>
>      http://twitpic.com/32us7s
>
>
>
> Darren Neimke
> darren.nei...@live.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: m...@miguelmadero.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:34:52 +1100
>
> Subject: Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?
> To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
>
> Nice post. But I'm not sure MS is pushing that much (or even that little)
> for WPF internally or externally.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com> wrote:
>
> I took the liberty of graphing this:
>
> http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Price 
> <step...@littlevoices.com>wrote:
>
> Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies?
> *feigned shocked look*
>
> I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for
> ages. Nothing changed here.
>
> Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :)
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <m...@miguelmadero.com> wrote:
> > I like how Shawn puts it,
> >>
> >> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites.
> >
> > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases
> for
> > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not
> much
> > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other
> > devices (maybe?).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <p...@paulstovell.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...at least for non-phones:
> >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/
> >>
> >>
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834
> >> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate
> >> Paul
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ozsilverlight mailing list
> >> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Miguel A. Madero Reyes
> > www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
> > m...@miguelmadero.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ozsilverlight mailing list
> > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Stovell
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>
>
>
> --
> Miguel A. Madero Reyes
> www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
> m...@miguelmadero.com
>
> _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozsilverlight mailing list
> ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
>
>


-- 
Paul Stovell
_______________________________________________
ozsilverlight mailing list
ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

Reply via email to