>>swarming-enabled p2p protocol for on demand ?
this has been around for a while; and swarming is nothing new; its just breaking a file into smaller parts; either physically or spiritually (calculated)...i think on-demand "swarming" has been done also.
this is the case where "everything old is new again," for example, almost all the web2.0 stuff has been tried in some variant before...just the graphics were different.
Nazareno Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nazareno Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think dijjer would do it http://dijjer.org/, however it doesn't seem
to be incentive-compatible.
I saw a poster at last year's sigcomm on a BT-inspired approach for
streaming video which was very much like you described, but I can't
remember the name of the project...
Htw,
Nazareno
Florent THIERY wrote:
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BitTorrent/message/5481
>
> I don't get why they are not implementing a Bittorrent variant for
> play-while-downloading (chunks prioritisation within time window). Read
> a paper once about bittorrent mod, saying that's more efficient than
> sequential downloading. Ever heard of swarming-enabled p2p protocol for
> on demand ?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
