On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:42 AM, David Barrett <dbarr...@quinthar.com> wrote:
> However, X can change. So rather than doing this once and being done
> with it, use this approach to "walk up" to a keepalive frequency that is
> "too low", then walk back "down" to a frequency that is "unnecessarily
> high", and then repeat. I've found X can change for a given router (or
> collection of routers), perhaps under load? So this keeps the system on
> its toes.
Interesting idea. What happens if you're trying to maintain more
connections than the NAT can handle? Your X will drop to zero?
--
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
