Well, a lot of people are willing to take a hit when it comes to ease of use to get more privacy. We're even willing to pay for one of these plugs.
Mats On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Chris Palmer <ch...@noncombatant.org>wrote: > Eugen Leitl writes: > > > Tor, Tahoe-LAFS, i2p, tinc, some kind of opportunistic > > encryption are obvious candidates, but what else? > > The purpose of Freedom Box is to compete with cloud services, which are > notable for their ease of use. That is much less true of these > technologies. > I don't see how Freedom Box can succeed without taking the usability > problem > head-on. > > > -- > http://noncombatant.org/ > > "These days, though, you have to be pretty technical before you can even > aspire to crudeness." --- William Gibson > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers >
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
