At 08:32 AM 3/23/2002 +0100, Bas A.Schulte wrote: .... >Ok, that is good to hear. I always thought I was too ignorant too >understand it ;) I suppose POE indeed uses a somewhat strange >terminology (wheels?). > >But isn't it a point of p5ee to normalize/standardize the terminology? >In that respect, would it be possible to use POE at a lower level >underneath an API(s) that is more in line with p5ee, terminoloy-wise? I >don't understand enough of it to assess that.
POE is envisioned (in P5EEx::Blue) to be one of the Contexts in which P5EE software may be run. The corresponding class would be (future): P5EEx::Blue::Context::POE People with POE experience are invited to help make that class a reality. A POE Context might be useful as a remote Procedure server, a Messaging server, a bizarre multi-user-application-in-a-single-process interfacing with users via Gtk, ... * Any volunteers? Stephen
