Is this website the official place we'll be storing idea that have common consensus?
_John Stephen Adkins wrote: > At 06:16 PM 10/25/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > >At 05:14 PM 10/25/2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... > >>I won't comment on the other strengths they alleged, like "smarter > >>programmers" ;-) > > > >I think I have stated on the mod_perl list that this is true to some > >degree. Or rather, it's not that the programmers are necessarily smarter, > >but certainly it's a lot easier to find experience in multi-tier > >development when you advertise for Java programmers versus Perl > >programming. It seems when advertising for Perl programmers, only 20% will > >have ever programmed an object in Perl, of that 20%, 20% will have coded > >with mod_perl and of that 20%, 20% of those will have coded in a > >multi-tier MVC environment. > > > >Whereas in Java, OO is a given. There is much literature and training for > >OO in Java. Servlets is the defacto standard -- there is no CGI to fall > >back on (equivalent to mod_perl), and RMI and similar tools makes > >multi-tier development so ridiculously easy (there are even IDEs to make it > >happen via a Wizard!) that it's difficult to find a Java programmer who has > >not practiced multi-tier development in some capacity. > > > >Anyway, this is one of the reasons for this list of course... To raise > >awareness for Perl developers who want to do enterprise developer, or > >multi-tier or what have you... > > Hi, > > I have proposed at > > http://www.officevision.com/pub/p5ee/ > > that one of the artifacts to emerge from the P5EE effort is > > A self-training curriculum for developers to become "self-certified" > as Enterprise Perl Developers, Enterprise Perl Architects, and > Enterprise Perl Administrators. > > This would attempt to address the level of enterprise development > expertise in the Perl community. > > Thoughts? > > Stephen
