On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Look, we need some sort of voting procedure here, > otherwise we're going to go back and forth with issues > like this. What scares me is we have at the moment a > situation similar to the Perl 6 process, whereby anyone > can throw ideas out. But we don't have a Larry, who we > (well, most people) trust. And we don't have an > Apache-like meritocracy. So how do we make decisions?
popular vote with a cutoff date? at least initially?
