On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof <beek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Romi Verma wrote: > > Hi All, >> >> pacemaker has one property "on_fail" for any operation configured for a >> resource. suppose i have set "on_fail" to "fence" for a monitor operation , >> then is it expected to fence the node in case of resource monitor failure ?? >> > > that would seem like a reasonable assumption Thanks Andrew for fast reply, i assume we need stonith for this. when resource monitor will fail on a node it means that node is undergoing some problematic situation , and due to this the resource fails over to another node. Well , now i am wondering if a node is not well then stonith will already come into the action. i mean to say even if i will not set "on_fail" to fence the node will be fenced by stonith (as other members of cluster will detect that node is not doing well and they will fence that errant node) so why do we have this "on_fail" feature. is there any special benefit of this "on_fail" feature i am missing?? > > can any one explain please. >> >> Best Regards, >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list >> Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
