Hi,

Steven Dake escribió:
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 17:05 -0700, hj lee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Steven Dake <sd...@redhat.com> wrote:
        > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Oscar Remí­rez de Ganuza
        Satrústegui
        > <oscar...@unav.es> wrote:
        > > In our tests, when we bring down the network interface
        (ifdown eth0), the
What is the use case for ifdown eth0 (ie what are you trying
        to verify)?

I have the same test case. In my case, when two nodes cluster is
disconnect, I want to see split-brain. And then I want to see the
split-brain handler resets one of nodes. What I want to verify is that
the cluster will recover network disconnection and split-brain
situation.


ifconfig eth0 down is a totally different then testing if there is a
node disconnection.  When corosync detects eth0 being taken down, it
binds to the interface 127.0.0.1.  This is probably not what you had in
mind when you wanted to test split brain.  Keep in mind an interface
taken out of service is different then an interface failing from a posix
api perspective.

What you really want to test is pulling the network cable between the
machines.
I wanted to test the split-brain situation too and the recovery from it. I also wanted to test a pingd resource and location we also have configured to see it the node put down the resources correctly when it detects no connection to the gateway.

Anyway, I have checked this situation and configuration successfully "pulling the network cable" from virtualcenter, but i got worried finding out that openais crashed and could not recover when the network interface gets down.

Thanks!

---
Oscar Remírez de Ganuza
Servicios Informáticos
Universidad de Navarra
Ed. de Derecho, Campus Universitario
31080 Pamplona (Navarra), Spain
tfno: +34 948 425600 Ext. 3130
http://www.unav.es/SI

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Reply via email to