On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >>> Andrew, >>> >>> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a >>> while, is there any chance you could consider publishing RCs before the >>> actual releases, at least for the stable-1.0 branch? >> Good idea. That would give others a chance to give the RC a try >> and report any problems before the final release. > > I use the following for the pacemaker rpms I'm using at any given time: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/testing/ > > They're for 64-bit F-12 but you can rebuild them for whatever platform you > like > I've no intention of building them for other platforms, I'd spend my > entire life building packages instead of getting any work done. > > Just be sure to refresh the metadata regularly, burning through > release numbers and disk space isn't the goal here.
Who said you should build RC _packages_? Tag an RC, upload a tarball, announce on mailing list, done. How is that extra work? No wait, Pacemaker builds directly from a Mercurial tarball. So scratch the upload part. Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker