On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Florian Haas <florian.h...@linbit.com> wrote: > On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >>>> Andrew, >>>> >>>> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a >>>> while, is there any chance you could consider publishing RCs before the >>>> actual releases, at least for the stable-1.0 branch? >>> Good idea. That would give others a chance to give the RC a try >>> and report any problems before the final release. >> >> I use the following for the pacemaker rpms I'm using at any given time: >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/testing/ >> >> They're for 64-bit F-12 but you can rebuild them for whatever platform you >> like >> I've no intention of building them for other platforms, I'd spend my >> entire life building packages instead of getting any work done. >> >> Just be sure to refresh the metadata regularly, burning through >> release numbers and disk space isn't the goal here. > > Who said you should build RC _packages_? > > Tag an RC, upload a tarball, announce on mailing list, done. How is that > extra work? > > No wait, Pacemaker builds directly from a Mercurial tarball. So scratch > the upload part.
What does the tag achieve apart from ensuring people waste their time testing versions that don't have any fixes since it was created? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
