That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.
Thanks Shravan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vadym Chepkov <vchep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra <shravan.mis...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker >>> 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. >> >> Have a read of: >> >> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >> >> I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 >> > > But http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases says it's "experimental" > version, not a stable one. > Is this page outdated then? > > Thanks, > Vadym > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
